There's a way of lookup by widget's id in widget template ?
by "widget template" I mean gtk_widget_class_set_template_from_resource
I've tried define following function in window class:
GtkWidget *
lookup_widget (CustomAppWindow *win,
const char *name)
{
return GTK_WIDGET (gtk_widget_get_template_child (GTK_WIDGET (win),
GTK_TYPE_WIDGET,
name));
}
but the gtk_widget_get_template_child always returns null.
calling gtk_widget_get_template_child() should never return NULL — but you should rarely have to call that function in the first place.
the correct way to access objects defined with GTK widget templates is to add a member to your instance data structure with the same name as in the XML definition, and then call gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child().
for instance, given the following XML description:
<interface>
<template class="FooWidget" parent="GtkBox">
<property name="orientation">GTK_ORIENTATION_HORIZONTAL</property>
<property name="spacing">4</property>
<child>
<object class="GtkButton" id="hello_button">
<property name="label">Hello World</property>
<signal name="clicked" handler="hello_button_clicked" object="FooWidget" swapped="yes"/>
</object>
</child>
<child>
<object class="GtkButton" id="goodbye_button">
<property name="label">Goodbye World</property>
</object>
</child>
</template>
</interface>
when creating your widget instance you typically will add two GtkWidget members in the instance data structure, such as:
typedef struct _FooWidget {
GtkBox parent_instance;
GtkWidget *hello_button;
GtkWidget *goodbye_button;
} FooWidget;
from your class initialization function, you will have to call the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child() function after setting the template:
static void
foo_widget_class_init (FooWidgetClass *klass)
{
// ...
gtk_widget_class_set_template_from_resource (GTK_WIDGET_CLASS (klass),
"/com/example/foo/widget.ui");
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child (GTK_WIDGET_CLASS (klass),
FooWidget, hello_button);
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child (GTK_WIDGET_CLASS (klass),
FooWidget, goodbye_button);
}
the template machinery inside GTK+ will ensure that the fields are set on instance initialization, and unset on instance finalization. this means that you can access those fields from your instance init right after you called gtk_widget_init_template():
static void
foo_widget_init (FooWidget *self)
{
gtk_widget_init_template (GTK_WIDGET (self));
// now you can access self->hello_button and self->goodbye_button
}
if you are not writing an application, or you want to hide the components of your composite widget from your instance structure, you can use a private structure and call gtk_widget_class_bind_template_private_child() instead.
remember you can also bind functions defined in your local scope to signal handlers defined in the XML, using gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback().
Related
I'm trying to access the StepExecution in my RowMapper but unable to do so. I have a property set in the xml called 'prop1'. I expect this to be set but it is not setting.I also added a #BeforeStep method to the RowMapper hoping I can get the stepExecutionContext but this method is never invoked. Is there something else I need to do?
Here is my xml:
<bean id="bean1"
class="org.springframework.batch.item.database.JdbcCursorItemReader"
scope="step">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
<property name="sql"
value="${sql}"/>
<property name="fetchSize" value="${fetchSize}"></property>
<property name="rowMapper">
<bean id="rowMapper1" class="c.p.MyRowMapper" scope="step">
<property name="prop1" value="${prop1}"></property>
</property>
Here is my RowMapper:
public class MyRowMapper implements RowMapper<Object>{
private String prop1;
private StepExecution se;
public String getProp1() {
return stepFatpCount;
}
public void setProp1(String rop1) {
this. prop1 = prop1;
}
#BeforeStep
public void beforeStep(StepExecution stepExecution){
this.se = stepExecution;
}
}
I have some properties set in the stepExecutionContext before this step in another step and I want to use them here in the RowMapper. The same thing works in the ItemProcessor but not the RowMapper. Please let me know if I need to do something more for lazy binding or any other issue.
Thanks.
The step execution context is not shared between steps. Maybe you mean job execution context?
I suppose you could register rowMapper1 as a listener in the step (with the <listeners> tag), but if you just want to read some value from the job execution context you could use
value="#{jobExecutionContext['foobar']}"
If you do want to have injected some value from the step execution context, you just have to replace stepExecutionContext above.
I have a component declared as:
<ipojo>
<component classname="HelloClass" name="helloCom" immediate="true">
<requires field="delayService" id="id1">
</requires>
</component>
<instance component="helloCom" name="hello">
<property name="requires.from">
<property name="id1" value="A"/>
</property>
</instance>
</ipojo>
The jar file of this component :helloComponent.jar
Now, i want to update (value="A") to (value="AA"). Thus, i implement a component using ConfigurationAdmin to update this property
public class ControllerReconfiguration {
private ConfigurationAdmin m_configAdmin;
#SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
public void reconfigure() throws IOException {
Configuration configuration = m_configAdmin.getConfiguration("hello","file:./helloComponent.jar");
configuration.setBundleLocation("file:./helloComponent.jar");
Properties props = new Properties();
//Dictionary props = new Hashtable();
props.put("id1", "AA");
configuration.update(props);
System.out.println("Update");
}
}
However, this ControllerReconfiguration component can't update the value 'A' (by 'AA') in 'hello' instance.
How to modify this ControllerReconfiguration component, please ?
Thanks you for your help.
Unfortunately, you can't push new 'from' configuration like this.
However, you can use the iPOJO introspection API directly: http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-ipojo/apache-felix-ipojo-userguide/ipojo-advanced-topics/using-ipojo-introspection-api.html
Retrieve the Architecture service of the instance
Retrieve the InstanceDescription and DependencyDescription
Call the setFilter method
Thanks Clement,
it works fine !!!!! :) I access InstanceManager using Factory.
Ex, in order to access InstanceManager of component "hello.call.CallHello"
#require
private Factory[] factories;
for (Factory factory : factories) {
/*
* "hello.call.CallHello" is a component name
* note: it is not component instance name
*/
if (factory.getName().equals("hello.call.CallHello")) {
/*
* a component can have many instances
* if there is only one instance.
* get(0) return the first instance.
*/
InstanceManager im = (InstanceManager) factory.getInstances().get(0);
}
I want a SkipListener for my CompositeItemProcessor which is a list of 2 processors processing an item like this:
Reader(itemRead) -> ValidationProcessor(itemRead, item) -> WrapProcessor(item, item)
The problem is that SkipListener accepts only a model item(the itemRead, hopefully I'm wrong here) in the
onSkipInProcess like onSkipInProcess(ValidationItem itemRead, Throwable arg1)
while I want the item from the 2nd processor too, inside this function.
There is also a high chance that the WrapProcessor might change output(depending the requirements) to something like that: WrapProcessor<item, anotherItem>
Is there a way to solve this issue?
My compositeItemProcessor config:
<bean id="compositeItemProcessor"
class="org.springframework.batch.item.support.CompositeItemProcessor">
<property name="delegates">
<list>
<bean class="com.mycompany.ValidationProcessor">/
<bean class="com.mycompany.WrapProcessor" />
</list>
</property>
</bean>
You can have your transformed object into a custom skip exception
class WrapProcessor implements ItemProcessor<ValidationItem, WrappedObject> {
O transform(ValidationItem item) {
WrappedObject wrapped = new Wrapped(item);
if(some condition) {
throw new SkipWrappedObject(wrapped);
}
...
}
}
and in onSkipInProcess(ValidationItem itemRead, Throwable arg1) arg1 can be casted to SkipWrappedObject ad you can access skipped wrapped object
I need to write a Spring batch custom item writer that uses a footer, but I can't use the delegate pattern.
Is there another way to write a Spring batch custom item writer?
Thank you in advance.
Create a custom ItemWriter that implements ItemStream (to manage restartability and footer writing) and overwrite the next methods:
ItemWrite.write(List<> items): write items and during writing perform necessary data calculation for footer
ItemStream.update(ExecutionContext): save calculated footer data in write() method
ItemStream.open(ExecutionContext): restore previously saved footer data
ItemStream.close(): do real footer writing (directly in your own writer or using a callback)
Check here
Basically you need to create a class that implements ItemWriter<YourModel> and FlatFileFooterCallback
In the write method, enter how data will be written and in the writeFooter the footer of the file.
Then declare your class as a bean and put it as a writer in your job.
I've found the solution. I can't write a custom itemwriter, but I created a bean out and I have overridden the toString method. In this method I have set the output to the file as needed. Then, I created a PassThroughLineAggregator type itemwriter. This itemwriter calls the toString method of the bean output. And that's all!!
Here's the code:
MOH_Diaria_Bean_Out.java:
package es.lac.absis.batch.app.percai.domain;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class MOH_Diaria_Bean_Out {
List<MOH_Diaria_Bean> listaBeans = new ArrayList<MOH_Diaria_Bean>();
public List<MOH_Diaria_Bean> getListaBeans() {
return listaBeans;
}
public void setListaBeans(List<MOH_Diaria_Bean> listaBeans) {
this.listaBeans = listaBeans;
}
public void add (MOH_Diaria_Bean bean){
listaBeans.add(bean);
}
#Override
public String toString() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
String salida="";
for (int j=0; j<listaBeans.size(); j++) {
MOH_Diaria_Bean bean = listaBeans.get(j);
salida = salida + bean.toString();
if (j<(listaBeans.size()-1)) {
salida = salida + "\n";
}
}
return salida;
}
}
ItemWriter:
<bean id="MOH_FusionadoFicheros_Writer" class="es.lac.absis.batch.arch.internal.writer.AbsisFlatFileItemWriter">
<property name="resource">
<bean class="es.lac.absis.batch.arch.internal.util.AbsisFileSystemResource">
<constructor-arg ref="filePCA00020"></constructor-arg>
</bean>
</property>
<property name="encoding" value="ISO8859_1"></property>
<property name="lineAggregator">
<bean class="org.springframework.batch.item.file.transform.PassThroughLineAggregator">
</bean>
</property>
</bean>
I'm familiar with how to pass data between steps in a Spring Batch job. But what happens when you job is composed of many smaller jobs? In the example below, I would like to set some data in the JobExecutionContext at the end of the first job, siNotificationJob. Then, that data could be read from the JobExecutionContext of StepExecutionContext in the next job, ciNotificationJob. Do I need to promote this data somehow? I can't seem to see the results in the Job Parameter Extractor defined in step 'ciNotificationJob' that I use to configure my job parameters.
Thoughts?
Andrew
<job id="notificationJob" xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/batch">
<batch:step id="pn_step_0" next="pn-step-1">
<batch:job ref="siNotificationJob" job-launcher="jobLauncher"
job-parameters-extractor="jobParamsExtractor"/>
</batch:step>
<batch:step id="pn-step-1" next="pn-step-2">
<batch:job ref="ciNotificationJob" job-launcher="jobLauncher"
job-parameters-extractor="jobParamsExtractor"/>
</batch:step>
</job>
I was able to resolve this. I'll show you through example how I solved it. It was complicated but I think the end result is fairly easy to understand.
I have one overall job called 'notificationJob'. It has three steps that calls 3 different jobs (not steps). Each of these jobs can run independently, or be called from within the top level 'notificationJob'. Also, each sub-job has many steps. I'm not going to show all those steps here, but just wanted to highlight that these are complete jobs themselves with more multliple steps.
<job id="notificationJob" xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/batch">
<batch:listeners>
<batch:listener ref="pn_job-parent-listener" />
</batch:listeners>
<batch:step id="pn_step-0" next="pn-step-1">
<batch:job ref="siNotificationJob" job-launcher="jobLauncher"
job-parameters-extractor="futureSiParamsExtractor"/>
</batch:step>
<batch:step id="pn-step-1" next="pn-step-2">
<batch:job ref="ciNotificationJob" job-launcher="jobLauncher"
job-parameters-extractor="futureCiParamsExtractor"/>
</batch:step>
<batch:step id="pn-step-2">
<batch:job ref="combineResultsJob" job-launcher="jobLauncher"
job-parameters-extractor="jobParamsExtractor"/>
</batch:step>
</job>
The key is being able to extract the results from one job and read them in the next job. Now, you could do this multiple ways. One way would be to output the result from one job into a DB or text file and then have the next job read from that file/table. Since I wasn't dealing with that much data, I passed the information around in memory. So, you'll notice the job-parameter-extractors. You can either rely on a built-in implementation of a paramter extractor, or you can implement your own. I actually use both. All they do is extract the value from the StepExecution and then we'll need to promote/move them to the next sub-job.
<bean id="jobParamsExtractor" class="org.springframework.batch.core.step.job.DefaultJobParametersExtractor">
<property name="keys">
<list>
<value>OUTPUT</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="futureSiParamsExtractor" class="jobs.SlideDatesParamExtractor">
<property name="mode" value="FORWARD" />
<property name="addedParams">
<map><entry>
<key><value>outputName</value></key>
<value>FUTURE_SI_JOB_RESULTS</value>
</entry></map>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="futureCiParamsExtractor" class="jobs.SlideDatesParamExtractor">
<property name="mode" value="FORWARD" />
<property name="addedParams">
<map><entry>
<key><value>outputName</value></key>
<value>FUTURE_CI_JOB_RESULTS</value>
</entry></map>
</property>
</bean>
Finally, you'll notice that there is a parent job listener. This is the magic that transfer the state from one job and makes it available to the next. Here is my implementation of the class that does that.
<bean id="pn_job-state-listener" class="jobs.JobStateListener">
<property name="parentJobListener" ref="pn_job-parent-listener" />
</bean>
<bean id="pn_job-parent-listener" class="cjobs.ParentJobListener">
</bean>
package jobs.permnotification;
import org.springframework.batch.core.JobExecution;
import org.springframework.batch.core.JobExecutionListener;
public class ParentJobListener implements JobExecutionListener
{
private JobExecution parentExecution;
#Override
public void beforeJob(JobExecution jobExecution)
{
this.parentExecution = jobExecution;
}
#Override
public void afterJob(JobExecution jobExecution)
{
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
public void setParentExecution(JobExecution parentExecution)
{
this.parentExecution = parentExecution;
}
public JobExecution getParentExecution()
{
return parentExecution;
}
}
package jobs.permnotification;
import org.springframework.batch.core.JobExecution;
import org.springframework.batch.core.JobExecutionListener;
public class JobStateListener implements JobExecutionListener
{
private ParentJobListener parentJobListener;
#Override
public void beforeJob(JobExecution jobExecution)
{
if(parentJobListener == null || parentJobListener.getParentExecution() == null) return;
passStateFromParentToJob(StepKey.FUTURE_SI_JOB_RESULTS.toString(), jobExecution);
passStateFromParentToJob(StepKey.FUTURE_CI_JOB_RESULTS.toString(), jobExecution);
passStateFromParentToJob(StepKey.OUTPUT.toString(), jobExecution);
}
#Override
public void afterJob(JobExecution jobExecution)
{
if(parentJobListener == null || parentJobListener.getParentExecution() == null) return;
//take state from child step and move it into the parent execution context
passStateFromJobToParent(StepKey.FUTURE_SI_JOB_RESULTS.toString(), jobExecution);
passStateFromJobToParent(StepKey.FUTURE_CI_JOB_RESULTS.toString(), jobExecution);
passStateFromJobToParent(StepKey.OUTPUT.toString(), jobExecution);
}
private void passStateFromJobToParent(String key, JobExecution jobExecution)
{
Object obj = jobExecution.getExecutionContext().get(key);
if(obj != null)
parentJobListener.getParentExecution().getExecutionContext().put(key, obj);
}
private void passStateFromParentToJob(String key, JobExecution jobExecution)
{
Object obj = parentJobListener.getParentExecution().getExecutionContext().get(key);
if(obj != null)
jobExecution.getExecutionContext().put(key, obj);
}
public void setParentJobListener(ParentJobListener parentJobListener)
{
this.parentJobListener = parentJobListener;
}
public ParentJobListener getParentJobListener()
{
return parentJobListener;
}
}
this is sort of a hack.... recommend you use spring integration instead..but see if this applies for your situation.
if you have the spring batch meta data tables set up, you can probably get at the data that you generate within each job if you query the tables for your latest job run. All your data in the job execution context is stored and can be queried.
spring batch meta tables