I'm in an AX 2012 R2 environment.
I've a custom document service in our environment. I can see it by opening the AIFService form in the AOT. There may be a better way of browsing all the available document services. I haven't found it yet.
Anyway, how do I find out all the parts (query, document name, document class name) associated with this custom service, assuming the standard naming conventions haven't been followed?
Thank you.
To know what document services are available, go to the AOT - Classes - AIFDocumentService. Right click the class, then Add-Ins - Type hierarchy browser. You'll get a list of all document service classes.
To find the document class based on the service, just open the source code of the service and look at the code. The create method for example takes a parameter of the type of the document and the find methods returns an object of that type.
In the document class declaration you will find a marco. The name of that macro (minus DCT) will be the name of your query. The AxBC classes will be Ax + the name of the table, for example AxInventTable.
You can use this code:
AxdWizardParameters axdWizardParameters;
;
axdWizardParameters = AifServiceClassGenerator::getServiceParameters(classStr(YOURSERVICECLASSNAME));
info(axdWizardParameters.parmAifServiceClassName());
info(axdWizardParameters.parmAifEntityClassName());
info(axdWizardParameters.parmName());
info(axdWizardParameters.parmQueryName());
Related
I'm trying to create a chat bot that will help users search up motorcycles.
I'm new to API.AI and have set up my entities and their synonyms, my intent and user expressions, as well as references to the entities (#engineSize, #make, #bikeType).
My problem is when I try to add a required action and prompt, and then try to save the intent, I get the following message:
"The following entities reference each other and form an infinite loop: [engineSize]."
Initially I thought I was using the references wrong in the user expressions. I deleted every reference except for one expression which uses all three entities.
I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks! Pix below for further details.
EDIT: I fixed one of the issues of trying to pass a template expression as an example. However, I still get the same error message. I will replace and update my image links to include the edits.
Annotated User expressions
Required Actions
Interestingly enough, the answer to this post would have been difficult to find because the problem was in defining my entities.
In the entity definitions, I included an #ref to the entity itself. ie the bikeType entity contained #bikeType as one of its definitions.
This is not to be mistaken with the User Expressions. As long as the user expression is marked as a Template (the entire line is denoted with an '#' on the far left, as opposed to a large " ), there should be no issues.
Edited for clarity to get at root problem
In the provided user input examples you give the intent, you are supposed to provide general examples and then highlight any text belonging to an entity to map where entities appear in user's inquiries.
In your case, you have input the actual entity reference '#engineSize' as an example belonging to the engineSize entity, creating a self reference.
A proper provided user example would look like:
Also note though that if you are just using entities to store generic information like numbers, addresses, times, etc. it generally makes far more sense to use prebuilt system entities for those categories than create a custom entity, for example #sys.number-integer might be exactly what you need
It looks like you need to get a firmer understanding of entities, for which I would recommend the documentation:
https://docs.api.ai/docs/concept-entities
I have a question I ask myself since Symfony 2 and it is still the case on 3.2
When you use the console to generate formType of entity :
doctrine:generate:form
The EntityType is in the \Form folder but not in \Form\Type
Why ?
Sensiolabs itself recommand to put it in the Type folder....
There is a way to adapt this one?
No it doesn't recommend that.
As you can see in either Symfony Doc examples or Symfony Best Practices Guide, it both use Form and not Type folder/namespace.
The second one even straightly says:
Best Practice
Put the form type classes in the AppBundle\Form namespace, unless you use other custom form classes like data transformers.
Namespace of course, means also path at the same time.
In addition, best practices recommends creating a sub namespace if other custom form classes are used (like DataTransformer).
For example, i always use :
---Form
-----------DataTransformer
-----------Type
In this case all form classes are stored in Type folder (and namespace).
I used the suggested approach in this question to return HATEOAS formatted outputs that match those returned by spring-data-rest. It works good, but is there a way to avoid boiler plate code to create entity resource assemblers like the QuestionResourceAssembler in the referenced question, if I only want to add 'self' links using the id to all entities? Perhaps using ResourceAssemblerSupport?
The easiest way is to simply use the Resource wrapper type:
Resource<Person> personResource = new Resource<>(person);
personResource.addLink(…);
personResource.addLink(…);
Links can be created either by simply instantiating them (i.e. new Link("http://localhost/foo", "relation") or by using the ControllerLinkBuilder which allows you to point to Controller methods for obtain a reverse mapping. See this section of the Readme for details.
I'm looking for an elegant solution for the following problem:
In my database, I have some predefined(!) entities. These entities have names and descriptions (Strings). Around the data access layer, there are some EJBs containing business logic to load/search for/etc. those entities.
Now for the frontend, we are developing a GWT application which calls the EJB methods on our backend.
The problem is, that the name and the descriptions of the entities mentioned above must be internationalized - e.g., depending on the user's locale, an entity's description must be "My cool description" (English) or "Beschreibung bla" (German) or whatever :)
My first approach was to use a resource string in the database. So entity A has a description "descriptionA", entity B has a description "descriptionB"... Later on, the GWT app (or any other client) translates this resource string into the actual description using some kind of "resource bundle". E.g.:
*resources_en.properties*:
descriptionA=Actual Description of Entity A
descriptionB=Actual Description of Entity B
*resources_de.properties*:
descriptionA=Beschreibung A
descriptionB=Beschreibung B
(Remember, the entities are predefined, so it's possible to "know" all descriptions at compile time. BUT it would be better if the resource bundle could be enhanced without having to recompile the application).
Is this possible with GWT? How can I do this? Is it better to "translate" on the server or on the client side?
Otherwise, I've to deal with all that i18n stuff on the backend side. Well, this would allow to keep data together (instead of defining the descriptions on the client side). But the big drawback is that the backend must be aware of the caller's locale.
Regards,
Frank
It's mainly a decision between download time/speed vs flexibility. If you compile it GWT inlines the messages and can generate a little faster code, because no string lookup has to be done. However, if you need to make changes and don't want to recompile or want to be a able to let users dynamically alter messages you need dynamic messages.
Regarding the latter case, the Dictionary class can help you with this, see also: http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideI18n.html#DevGuideDynamicStringInternationalization
With the Dictionary you generate all messages in the static page served to the user. The users locale can be found in the header Accept-Language, which is send by the browser when a page is requested.
In either case (compiled or dynamic) you might want to serve the locale set by the user in some configuration property and in that case you still need logic for both cases on the server side to serve the locale to the user.
Everything is possible for those who try...
Back to your question: there are several ways to resolve your issue. One would be to introduce some kind of i18n facade and treat your descriptions and names as resource keys. Then you could define convenience methods to access translations i.e. public String translate(String message, Locale locale);. This method could use standard Java ResourceBundle class to access resources at runtime.
The only real problem I see is how to deal with compound messages (i.e. "Blah, blah 4 items" where 4 is a placeholder). Well, what we did in one project in similar situation, we added delimiter and actual resource key then another delimiter and count: "Blah, blah 4 items##items.in.your.whatever##4". In the case of English you could simply trim the first part and for other languages you would need to process whole string.
I am trying to create Web Services from the Top-Down approach. I downloaded Eclipse and am using the WSDL gui editor in it to build my WSDL files.
I am splitting up my Services based on "modules". The Types I am adding to the WSDLs all need to reference common stuff, such as PersonEntity, AddressEntity, States enumeration (simple type), Countries enumeration (simple type), and AbstractEntity. Since those items are all common I created a seperate WSDL file (named Commons.wsdl) that contains the type information for those types.
I want to "import" that WSDL into my other WSDL files to use:
For example, I have an entity named RegistrationEntity which inherits from AbstractEntity and contains a PersonEntity as well as an AddressEntity. I'm not sure how to do this... I saw that the WSDL spec has "import" and "include" and am not sure which one to use. Also, how do I actually import (or include) the Commons.wsdl file so that I can use the Types defined within it?
Thanks!
Oh, and I'm not sure if I'm supposed to stick this stuff in a seperate WSDL but another type of file such as an xsd or something. I really wanna follow best practices so if that's the proper way to do it then I'd rather do that.
I found out that the problem I had was I was creating a WSDL file for my commons and using an inline scheme for that, rather than creating an XSD file to be imported by my other WSDLs.
So instead I just created an Commons.XSD as my "Common Schema".