I try to run some tasks with different users on 1 server.
The possible solution was to create additional roles like
role :root, %w{root#ip}
It works but if I run
cap stage deploy
it fails, as some default tasks are run on root role too , though I need this role for my tasks only.
It there a way to define a role so that default deploy task won't run on this role?
I know this question is old but I found it while Googling the problem so I'll answer for anyone else who finds this question.
To keep something out of release add no_release: true as an option. So in your example define the root role like this:
role :root, %w{root#ip}, no_release: true
Related
What're permissions allow developers to run corb for selecting/updating nodes in MarkLogic.
roles: hadoop-user-read
hadoop-user-write
The exact permissions will depend upon your environment.
At a minimum you will need to be able to login to the XDBC server and eval code and/or invoke modules, read URIs, and write documents.
I'd start by giving the user the rest-evaluator role, which will give them rest-reader and rest-writer roles, plus the following execute permissions:
xdbc:eval
xdbc:eval-in
xdbc:invoke
xdbc:invoke-in
I'm trying to use Capistrano (for the first time) to deploy a website. My web hosting is with MediaTemple. Where the dir structure for a website looks like this:
domains/site.com/html/index.html
It looks like Capistrano's default deployment tries to create a var/www directory to place your application inside.
I'm getting this error when trying to run cap production deploy:
mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/www': Permission denied
I assume I don't have the privileges to create these folders, is there a way around this instead of manually creating them?
Also, would the var/www structure be recommended, or would it be worth dumping my application in domains/site.com?
This is my first experience with Capistrano, so any help with this is appreciated. Thanks in advance!
In a default Capistrano deployment setup, there is a commented line that looks like:
# Default deploy_to directory is /var/www/my_app
# set :deploy_to, '/var/www/my_app'
You will want to uncomment the set line and change the path to be the location you want your application deployed to.
If I understand correctly the standard git deploy implementation with capistrano v3 deploys the same repository on all roles. I have a more difficult app that has several types of servers and each type has its own code base with its own repository. My database server for example does not need to deploy any code.
How do I tackle such a problem in capistrano v3?
Should I write my own deployment tasks for each of the roles?
How do I tackle such a problem in capistrano v3?
All servers get the code, as in certain environments the code is needed to perform some actions. For example in a typical setup the web server needs your static assets, the app server needs your code to serve the app, and the db server needs your code to run migrations.
If that's not true in your environment and you don't want the code on the servers in some roles, you could easily send a pull request to add the no_release feature back from Cap2 in to Cap3.
You can of course take the .rake files out of the Gem, and load those in your Capfile, which is a perfectly valid way to use the tool, and modify them for your own needs.
The general approach is that if you don't need code on your DB server, for example, why is it listed in your deployment file?
I can confirm you can use no_release: true to disable a server from deploying the repository code.
I needed to do this so I could specifically run a restart task for a different server.
Be sure to give your server a role so that you can target it. There is a handy function called release_roles() you can use to target servers that have your repository code.
Then you can separate any tasks (like my restart) to be independent from the deploy procedure.
For Example:
server '10.10.10.10', port: 22, user: 'deploy', roles: %w{web app db assets}
server '10.10.10.20', port: 22, user: 'deploy', roles: %w{frontend}, no_release: true
namespace :nginx do
desc 'Reloading PHP will clear OpCache. Remove Nginx Cache files to force regeneration.'
task :reload do
on roles(:frontend) do
execute "sudo /usr/sbin/service php7.1-fpm reload"
execute "sudo /usr/bin/find /var/run/nginx-cache -type f -delete"
end
end
end
after 'deploy:finished', 'nginx:reload'
after 'deploy:rollback', 'nginx:reload'
# Example of a task for release_roles() only
desc 'Update composer'
task :update do
on release_roles(:all) do
execute "cd #{release_path} && composer update"
end
end
before 'deploy:publishing', 'composer:update'
I can think of many scenarios where this would come in handy.
FYI, this link has more useful examples:
https://capistranorb.com/documentation/advanced-features/property-filtering/
I consider to use Capistrano to deploy my rails app on my server. Currently I'm using a script, which does all the work for me. But Capistrano looks pretty nice and I want to give it a try.
My first problem/question now is: How to use Capistrano properly in open source projects? I don't want to publish my deploy.rb for several reasons:
It contains sensible informations about my server. I don't want to publish them :)
It contains the config for MY server. For other people, which deploy that open source project to their own server, the configuration may differ. So it's pretty senseless to publish my configuration, because it's useless for other people.
Second problem/question: How do I manage different environments?
Background: On my server I provide two different environments for my application: The stable system using the current stable release branch and located under www.domain.com. And a integration environment for the develop team under dev.domain.com running the master branch.
How do I tell Capistrano to deploy the stable system or the dev system?
The way I handle sensitive information (passwords etc.) in Capistrano is the same way I handle them in general: I use an APP_CONFIG hash that comes from a YAML file that isn't checked into version control. This is a classic technique that's covered e.g. in RailsCast #226, or see this StackOverflow question.
There are a few things you have to do a little differently when using this approach with Capistrano:
Normally APP_CONFIG is loaded from your config/application.rb (so it happens early enough to be usable everywhere else); but Capistrano cap tasks won't load that file. But you can just load it from config/deploy.rb too; here's the top of a contrived config/deploy.rb file using an HTTP repository that requires a username/password.
require 'bundler/capistrano'
APP_CONFIG = YAML.load_file("config/app_config.yml")
set :repo_user, APP_CONFIG['repo_user']
set :repo_password, APP_CONFIG['repo_password']
set :repository, "http://#{repo_user}:#{repo_password}#hostname/repositoryname.git/"
set :scm, :git
# ...
The config/app_config.yml file is not checked into version control (put that path in your .gitignore or similar); I normally check in a config/app_config.yml.sample that shows the parameters that need to be configured:
repo_user: 'usernamehere'
repo_password: 'passwordhere'
If you're using the APP_CONFIG for your application, it probably needs to have different values on your different deploy hosts. So have your Capistrano setup make a symlink from the shared/ directory to each release after it's checked out. You want to do this early in the deploy process, because applying migrations might need a database password. So in your config/deploy.rb put this:
after 'deploy:update_code', 'deploy:symlink_app_config'
namespace :deploy do
desc "Symlinks the app_config.yml"
task :symlink_app_config, :roles => [:web, :app, :db] do
run "ln -nfs #{deploy_to}/shared/config/app_config.yml #{release_path}/config/app_config.yml"
end
end
Now, for the second part of your question (about deploying to multiple hosts), you should configure separate Capistrano "stages" for each host. You put everything that's common across all stages in your config/deploy.rb file, and then you put everything that's unique to each stage into config/deploy/[stagename].rb files. You'll have a section in config/deploy.rb that defines the stages:
# Capistrano settings
require 'bundler/capistrano'
require 'capistrano/ext/multistage'
set :stages, %w(preproduction production)
set :default_stage, 'preproduction'
(You can call the stages whatever you want; the Capistrano stage name is separate from the Rails environment name, so the stage doesn't have to be called "production".) Now when you use the cap command, insert the stage name between cap and the target name, e.g.:
$ cap preproduction deploy #deploys to the 'preproduction' environment
$ cap production deploy #deploys to the 'production' environment
$ cap deploy #deploys to whatever you defined as the default
Capistrano is working great to deploy to a single server. However, I have multiple production API servers for my web application. When I deploy, my code needs to get deployed to every API server at once. Specifying each server manually is NOT the solution I am looking for (e.g. I don't want to do "cap api1 deploy; cap api2 deploy").
Is there a way, using Capistrano, to deploy to all servers at once, with just a simple "cap deploy"? I'm wondering what changes I would need to make to a typical deploy.rb file, whether I'd need to create a separate file for each server, and whether and how the Capfile would need to be changed. Also, I need to be able to specify a different deploy_to path for each server. And ideally, I wouldn't have to repeat things in different config files for different servers (eg. wouldn't have to specify :repository, :application, etc. multiple times).
I have spent hours searching Google on this and looking through tutorials, but I have found nothing helpful.
Here is a snippet from my current deploy.rb file:
set :application, "testapplication"
set :repository, "ssh://domain.com//srv/hg/#{application}"
set :scm, :mercurial
set :deploy_to, "/srv/www/#{application}"
role :web, "domain.com"
role :app, "domain.com"
role :db, "domain.com", :primary => true, :norelease => true
Should I just use the multistage extension and do this?
task :deploy_everything do
system "cap api1 deploy"
system "cap api2 deploy"
system "cap api2 deploy"
end
That could work, but I feel like this isn't what this extension is meant for...
It seems like you might be interested in the "Multiple Servers" heading on the Getting Started page. Is that what you're after?