I am trying to develop a coptic in Unicode. I already have the gylphs in a font file but there are specific marks that are placed on the top left of the letters (sometimes the middle) which would be easy to recreate if it preceded the letter. But in the Unicode standard, all marks must be written after the letter. So the only thing I can do is use OpenType to always move those marks to the desired position on the letter.
I have used Microsoft Volt to try this but the final font file still didn't look correct when I install it in an OS and try to use it.
Any recommendations of other ways of developing the font in Opentype?
Related
In xcode, developing for iOS "\u{1F3F3}\u{FE0F}\u{200D}\u{1F308}" is a rainbow flag.
"\u{1F3F3}" is a white flag, and "\u{1F308}" is a rainbow. The middle symbols "\u{FE0F}\u{200D}" are invisible symbols used to join these two together to make the rainbow flag symbol.
I am trying to combine unicode characters to make a rainbow infinity symbol, but not exactly sure how to implement this.
Not sure if there is an already existing unicode character or apple api I can use to do this, but would appreciate learning how to do this
I wouldn't mind having an infinity symbol over the rainbow flag either (like the apple anti-lgbt flag incident) as an alternative.
Emoji fonts are still just fonts. If they don’t contain a specific glyph, then they cannot display that glyph. The reason “🏳️🌈” looks like a rainbow flag is because someone drew a picture of a rainbow flag and then defined their font in such a way that the sequence <U+1F3F3, U+FE0F, U+200D, U+1F308> would be displayed using that specific image. Much like how someone first had to define the precise shape of the letter “A” in their font and then apply that glyph to the codepoint U+0041.
There is no image-rendering code that instinctively knows how to apply the colours of 🌈 to the shape of 🏳️ and then automatically generates a new glyph on the fly. It’s all explicitly pre-defined.
U+200D is the so-called Zero Width Joiner (ZWJ), so emoji sequences using that character are appropriately named Zero Width Joiner Sequences. They were originally invented by Apple to support emoji that weren’t part of the Unicode standard (in particular, variants of 💏, 💑, and 👪️ with different gender configurations), but later other vendors jumped on board as well and nowadays they are officially part of Unicode as an alternative way for defining new emoji without having to encode entirely new characters. Currently, about a third of all officially recommended emoji are ZWJ sequences.
In theory, any person can make up their own ZWJ sequences just by joining existing characters together (as was their original intent). In your case, “♾️+ZWJ+🌈” or <U+267E, U+FE0F, U+200D, U+1F308> would be an obvious sequence for a rainbow-coloured infinity symbol. You just have to create your own font containing the glyph you want, and then distribute that font to other people so that they can see the same glyph as you. There are just a few problems:
Making fonts with colourful glyphs is not easy. I couldn’t tell you whether there even exist freely available tools for that task.
There are four different formats for emoji fonts (used by Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla respectively) and they generally do not work on each other’s platforms, so you would need to create not just one, but several fonts unless you don’t care about people on other operating systems.
Installing your own fonts is not possible on most mobile phones, so your custom emoji would mostly only be available to desktop users.
There are several unicode relevant questions has been confusing me for some time.
For these reasons as follow I think the unicode characters are existed on disk.
Execute echo "\u6211" in terminal, it will print the glyph corresponding to the unicode code point U+6211.
There's a concept of UCD (unicode character database), and We can download it's latest version. UCD latest
Some new version unicode characters like latest emojis can not display on my mac until I upgrade macOS version.
So if the unicode characters does existed on the disk , then ：
Where is it ?
How can I upgrade it ?
What's the process of mapping the unicode code point to a glyph ?
If I use a specific font, then what's the process of mapping the unicode code point to a glyph ?
If not, then what's the process of mapping the unicode code point to a glyph ?
It will very appreciated if someone could shed light on these problems.
Execute echo "\u6211" in terminal, it will print the glyph corresponding to the unicode code point U+6211.
That's echo -e in bash.
› echo "\u6211"
\u6211
› echo -e "\u6211"
我
Where is it ?
In the font file.
Some new version unicode characters like latest emojis can not display on my mac until I upgrade macOS version.
How can I upgrade it ?
Installing/upgrading a suitable font with the emojis should be enough. I don't have macOS, so I cannot verify this.
I use "Noto Color Emoji" version 2.011/20180424, it works fine.
What's the process of mapping the unicode code point to a glyph ?
The application (e.g. text editor) provides the font rendering subsystem (Quartz? on macOS) with Unicode text and a font name. The font renderer analyses the codepoints of the text and decides whether this is simple text (e.g. Latin, Chinese, stand-alone emojis) or complex text (e.g. Latin with many marks, Thai, Arabic, emojis with zero-width joiners). The renderer finds the corresponding outlines in the font file. If the file does not have the required glyph, the renderer may use a similar font, or use a configured fallback font for a poor substitute (white box, black question mark etc.). Then the outlines undergo shaping to compose a complex glyph and line-breaking. Finally, the font renderer hands off the result to the display system.
Apart from the shaping, very little of this has to do with Unicode or encoding. Font rendering already used to work that way before Unicode existed, of course font files and rendering was much simpler 30 years ago. Encoding only matters when someone wants to load or save text from an application.
Summary: investigate
Truetype/Opentype font editing software so you can see what's contained in the files
font renderers, on Linux look at the libraries pango and freetype.
Generally speaking, operating system components that use text use the Unicode character set. In particular, font files use the Unicode character set. But, not all font files support all the Unicode codepoints.
When a codepoint is not supported by one font, the system might fallback to another that does. This is particularly true of web browsers. But ultimately if the codepoint is not supported, an unfilled rectangle is rendered. (There is no character for that because it's not a character. In fact, if you were able to copy and paste it as text, it should be the original character that couldn't be rendered.)
In web development, the web page can either supply or give the location of fonts that should work for the codepoints it uses.
Other programs typically use the operating system's rendering facilities and therefore the fonts available through it. How to install a font in an operating system is not a programming question (unless you are including a font in an installer for your program). For more information on that, you could see if the question fits with the Ask Different (Apple) Stack Exchange site.
Encoding is maping that gives characters or symbols a unique value.
If a character is not present in encoding no matter what font you use it won't display correct fonts
Like Lucida console, arial or terminal
But problem is terminal font is showing line draw characters but other font is not showing line draw characters
My question is why terminal is behaving different to other font
Plz note
Windows 7
Locale English
For the impatient, the relevant link is at the bottom of this answer.
Encoding is maping that gives characters or symbols a unique value.
No, that are the specifics of a character-set, which maps certain characters to code points (using the Unicode terminology). Lets ignore the above for now.
If a character is not present in encoding no matter what font you use it won't display correct fonts Like Lucida console, arial or terminal
Font formats map Unicode code points to glyphs. Not all code points may be mapped for specific fonts - somebody has to create all these symbols. Again, lets ignore this.
Not all binary encodings may map to code points within a certain character set; this is possibly what you mean.
But problem is terminal font is showing line draw characters but other font is not showing line draw characters
Your terminal seems to operate on a different character set, probably the "OEM" or "IBM PC" character set instead of a Unicode compliant character set or Windows-1252 / ISO 8859-1 / Latin.
If it is the latter than you are out of luck unless you can set your output-terminal to another character set, as Windows-1252 doesn't support the box drawing characters at all.
Solutions:
If possible try and set the output to OEM / IBM PC character set.
If it is Unicode you can try and convert the output to Unicode: read it in (decode it) using the OEM character set and then re-encode it using the box drawing subset.
Pretty much as the title says. Rendering all of the unicode format correctly what with composite characters and characters that affect other characters and ligatures is really hard, I understand that. We have fonts that seem to be designed for maximum Unicode symbol support(Symbola, Code2001, others) and specialized fonts for certain planes or character ranges(BabelStone Han, others).
I don't know much about the underlying technical details for fonts. Is there a maximum size? Is it a copyright problem? Is essentially redrawing all ~110,000 extant glyphs too hard? I understand style concerns, but why not fall back to a 'default' font that had glyphs for everything? They're on unicode.org, redrawing them all would be pretty hard work but then you'd have a guaranteed fallback font for everything. If you got rights to some pre-existing fonts you could just composite them and that should help a lot. Such a font would be a great help to humanity and I can't see a good technical reason why it doesn't exist or at least an open-source effort to create it, so I presume an invisible-to-me reason why it can't be done.
What is that reason?
"Why would you even want that?" questions aside, from a programming perspective there's a very simple reason: the OpenType spec only affords an addressable glyph index space of one USHORT, so one font can only support 16 bits worth of glyphs identifiers, or 65,536 glyphs max. (And note the terminology: a "glyph" is not the same as a "character" or "letter")
The current version of Unicode, v8 as of this answer, contains 120,737 assigned code points, or almost twice as many as fit in a modern font (2021 edit: v13 upped this number to 143,859). In fact, Unicode hasn't been able to fit in a modern OpenType font since 2001, with the release of Unicode 3.1, which upped the number of code points from 49,259 to 94,205.
"So what about font collections?" I hear you ask. Why not use multiple fonts and support all unicode that way? Well now, you've just described Adobe's Sans Pro, and Google's Noto (which are the same font).
As for the "how hard can it be": a uniform style for all glyphs in Unicode, across 129 established written scripts on this planet, each with their own typesetting rules? Incredibly hard. You may think fonts are just files with pictures for letters, and someone types a letter, that picture shows up: that is not how fonts work, and isn't how fonts have worked since the late 1980's.
Modern fonts are the typographic equivalent of a game ROM: sure, it's not much use without the hardware or software to run that ROM on, but all the things that actually matter are in the ROM. Similarly, modern fonts contain all the information for typesetting. Not just pictures, they contain the metadata, the metrics, the positioning and substitutions rules for arbitrary sequences, with separate rule sets for each written script that OpenType supports, mandatory and optional ligatures, language-specific character replacements for letters at the start/middle/final position in a word, or in isolation, character repositioning relative to arbitarily complex sequences of other characters either before or after it, arbitrarily complex sequence replacements with other arbitrarily complex sequences, possible bitmap fallbacks for small-point rendering, hinting instructions on how to properly rasterize vector graphics that are inherently not aligned to any particular pixel grid, and more. A modern font is a ridiculously complex application, that a font engine consults to figure out how to typeset sequences of code points.
Making a (set of) Unicode-encompassing font(s) that looks good for all contexts is a vast team effort.
So: "Why isn't there a font that contains all Unicode glyphs?", because that's been technically impossible since 2001. We can, and do, make font families that cover all of Unicode, but with 129 different scripts all with their own typesetting rules, it's a lot of work, and almost (almost) not worth the effort compared to only covering a subset of all languages.
And as for this:
Such a font would be a great help to humanity and I can't see a good technical reason why it doesn't exist or at least an open-source effort to create it, so I presume an invisible-to-me reason why it can't be done.
Just because you didn't know about them, doesn't mean they don't exist, with millions of people who are familiar with them. They exist =)
They're even open source, go out and thank the people who made them!
There is GNU Unifont. It aims to contain all Unicode, except Apple Emoji.
You will probably find what you are looking for at the following links.
Unicode Character Table
HTML Character Entity References
Huge List of Unicode Symbols
List of Unicode Characters of Category “Other Symbol
This other is funny for particular character since you can draw what you search:
Unicode Character Recognition
Can't enter unicode character with Alt+ even with EnableHexNumpad
Basic Questions
Q: How many characters are in Unicode?
A: The short answer is that as of Version 13.0, the Unicode Standard contains 143,859 characters. The long answer is rather more complicated, because of all the different kinds of characters that people might be interested in counting.
Unicode font
A Unicode font is a computer font that maps glyphs to code points defined in the Unicode Standard. The vast majority of modern computer fonts use Unicode mappings, even those fonts which only include glyphs for a single writing system, or even only support the basic Latin alphabet.
Fonts which support a wide range of Unicode scripts and Unicode symbols are sometimes referred to as "pan-Unicode fonts", although as the maximum number of glyphs that can be defined in a TrueType font is restricted to 65,535, it is not possible for a single font to provide individual glyphs for all defined Unicode characters (143,859 characters, with Unicode 13.0).
...
No single "Unicode font" includes all the characters defined in the present revision of ISO 10646 (Unicode) standard, as more and more languages and characters are continually added to it, and common font formats cannot contain more than 65,535 glyphs (about half the number of characters encoded in Unicode).
As a result, font developers and foundries incorporate new characters in newer versions or revisions of a font, or in separate auxiliary fonts intended specifically for particular languages.
Enjoy!
I copied large amount of text from another system to my PC. When I viewed the text in my PC, it looked weird. So I copied all the fonts from the other PC and installed them in mine too. Now the text looks okay, but actually it seems that is not in Unicode. For example, if I copy the text and paste in another UTF-8 supported editor such as Notepad++, I get English characters ("bgah;") only like shown below.
How to convert this whole text into unicode text, like the one below. So I can copy the text and paste anywhere else.
பெயர்
The above text was manually obtained using http://www.google.com/transliterate/indic/Tamil
I need this conversion to be done, so I can copy them into database tables.
'Ja-01' is a font with a custom 'visual encoding'.
That is to say, the sequence of characters really is "bgah;" and it only looks like Tamil to you because the font's shapes for the Latin characters bg look like பெ.
This is always to be avoided, because by storing the content as "bgah;" you lose the ability to search and process it as real Tamil, but this approach was common in the pre-Unicode days especially for less-widespread scripts without mature encoding standards. This application probably predates widespread use of TSCII.
Because it is a custom encoding not shared by any other font, it is very unlikely you will be able to find a tool to convert content in this encoding to proper Unicode characters. It does not appear to be any standard character ordering, so you will have to look at the font (eg in charmap.exe) and note down every character, find the matching character in Unicode and map between them.
For example here's a trivial Python script to replace characters in a file:
mapping= {
u'a': u'\u0BAF', # Tamil letter Ya
u'b': u'\u0BAA', # Tamil letter Pa
u'g': u'\u0BC6', # Tamil vowel sign E (combining)
u'h': u'\u0BB0', # Tamil letter Ra
u';': u'\u0BCD', # Tamil sign virama (combining)
# fill in the rest of the mapping information here!
}
with open('ja01data.txt', 'rb') as fp:
data= fp.read().decode('utf-8')
for char in mapping:
data= data.replace(char, mapping[char])
with open('utf8data.txt', 'wb') as fp:
fp.write(data.encode('utf-8'))
The font you found is getting you into trouble. The actual cell text is "bgah;", it gets rendered to பெயர் because you found a font that can work with 8-bit non-Unicode characters. So reading it or pasting it into Notepad++ is going to produce "bgah;" since that's the real text. It can only ever be rendered properly again by forcing the program that displays the string to use that same font.
Ditch the font and enter Unicode so it looks like this:
"bgah" looks like a Baamini based system, which is pre-unicode. It was popular in Canada (and the SL Tamil diaspora in general) in the 90s.
As the others mentioned, it looks like a custom visual encoding that mimics the performance of a foreign script while maintaining ASCII encoding.
Google "Baamini to unicode convertor". The University of Colombo seems to have put one up: http://www.ucsc.cmb.ac.lk/ltrl/services/feconverter/?maps=t_b-u.xml
Let me know if this works. If not, I can ask around and get something for you.
You could first check whether the encoding is TSCII, as this sounds most probable. It is an 8-bit encoding, and the fonts you copied are probably based on that encoding. Check out whether the TSCII to UTF-8 converter at SourceForge is suitable. The project there is called “Any Tamil Encoding to Unicode” but they say that only TSCII is supported for now.