I have an application that is using jstree. In this app I have set the “data” section of core to an empty array as you see below:
$("#jstree")
.jstree({
"core": {
"data": [],
"check_callback" : true,
"themes": {
"theme": "default",
"icons": false
}
},
"plugins": [ "state" ]
})
I am using jstree.create_node() to add new nodes to the tree programmatically as new data is sent to the browser. When I refresh the page the tree does not maintain the state even though I am using the state plugin. However if I set the data field in core to an actual JSON object, it would work as described in the state plugin:
"core": {
"data":[{"id":"a", "parent":"#", "text":"nodeA"},{"id":"b", "parent":"a", "text":"nodeB"}],
"check_callback" : true,
"themes": {
"theme": "default",
"icons": false
}
Is there a difference between the two ways of doing it that affects the state plugin?
Thanks!
Actually, it just works.
jstree({
"core": {
"data": [
{"id":"a", "parent":"#", "text":"nodeA"},{"id":"b", "parent":"a", "text":"nodeB"}
],
"check_callback" : true,
"themes": {
"theme": "default",
"icons": false
}
},
"plugins": [ "state" ]
})
Check out codepen, try adding a new node or expand/collapse node and then reload the page. The state will be remembered.
Related
I am creating a strict validator for a complex JSON file and want to re-use various definitions in order to keep the schema manageable and easier to update.
According to the documentation it is necessary to use allOf to extend a definition to add more properties. This is exactly what I've done, but I find that without use of additionalProperties set to false validation doesn't prevent arbitrary other properties being added.
The following massively cut-down schema demonstrates what I'm doing:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"$id": "https://example.com/schema/2021/02/example.json",
"description": "This schema demonstrates how VSCode's JSON schema mechanism fails with allOf used to extend a definition",
"definitions": {
"valueProvider": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"example": {
"type": "string"
},
"alternative": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"oneOf": [
{
"required": [
"example"
]
},
{
"required": [
"alternative"
]
}
]
},
"selector": {
"type": "object",
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/valueProvider"
},
{
"required": [
"operator",
"value"
],
"properties": {
"operator": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"IsNull",
"Equals",
"NotEquals",
"Greater",
"GreaterOrEquals",
"Less",
"LessOrEquals"
]
},
"value": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
],
"additionalProperties": false
}
},
"properties": {
"show": {
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"selector": {
"description": "This property does not function correctly in VSCode",
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/selector"
},
{
"additionalProperties": false
}
]
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
}
}
This works a treat in IntelliJ IDEA's JSON editor (2020.3.2 ultimate edition) when editing JSON against this schema (using a schema mapping). For example, the file ex-fail.json's content of:
{
"show": {
"name": "a",
"selector": {
"example": "a",
"operator": "IsNull",
"value": "false",
"d": "a"
}
}
}
Is correctly validated, simply highlighting "d" as not allowed, thus:
However, when I use the very same schema and JSON file with VSCode (1.53.2) with vanilla configuration (except for a schema mapping) VSCode erroneously marks "example", "operator", "value" and "d" as not allowed. It looks like this in the VSCode editor:
If I remove the additionalProperties definition from the show.selector property, both IDEA and VSCode indicate that all is well, including allowing the "d" property - in doing this I can simplify that property definition to:
"selector": {
"description": "This property does not function correctly in VSCode",
"$ref": "#/definitions/selector"
}
What can I do to the schema to support both IDEA and VSCode whilst disallowing additional properties where they should not appear?
PS: The schema mapping in VSCode is simply along the lines of:
{
"json.schemas": [
{
"fileMatch": [
"*/config/ex-*.json"
],
"url": "file:///C:/my/path/to/example-schema.json"
}
]
}
You cannot do what you ask with JSON Schema draft-07 or prior.
The reason is, when $ref is used in a schema object, all other properties MUST be ignored.
An object schema with a "$ref" property MUST be interpreted as a
"$ref" reference. The value of the "$ref" property MUST be a URI
Reference. Resolved against the current URI base, it identifies the
URI of a schema to use. All other properties in a "$ref" object MUST
be ignored.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-handrews-json-schema-01#section-8.3
We changed this to not be the case for draft 2019-09.
It sounds like VSCode is merging the properties in applicators upwards to the nearest schema object (which is wrong), and IntelliJ IDEA is doing something similar but in a different way (which is also wrong).
The correct validation result for your schema and instance is VALID. See the live demo here: https://jsonschema.dev/s/C6ent
additionalProperties relies on the values of properties and patternProperties within the SAME schema object. It cannot "see through" applicators such as $ref and allOf.
For draft 2019-09, we added unevaluatedProperties, which CAN "see through" applicator keywords (although it's a little more complex than that).
Update:
After reviewing your update, sadly the same is still true.
One approach makes it sort of possible but involves some duplication, and only works when you control the schemas you are referencing.
You would need to redefine your selector property like this...
"selector": {
"description": "This property did not function correctly in VSCode",
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/selector"
},
{
"properties": {
"operator": true,
"value": true,
"example": true,
"alternative": true
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
]
}
The values of a property object are schema values, and booleans are valid schemas. You don't need (or want to) deal with their validation here, only say these are the allowed ones, followed by no additionalProperties.
You'll also need to remove the additionalProperties: false from your definition of selector, as that is preventing ALL properties (which I now guess is why you saw that issue in one of the editors).
It involves some duplication, but is the only way I'm aware of that you can do this for draft-07 or previous. As I said, not a problem for draft 2019-09 or above due to new kewords.
additionalProperties is problematic because it depends on the properties and patternProperties. The result is that "additionalProperties": false effectively blocks schema composition. #Relequestual showed one alternative approach, here is another approach that is a little less verbose, but still requires duplication of property names.
draft-06 and up
{
"allOf": [{ "$ref": "#/definitions/base" }],
"properties": {
"bar": { "type": "number" }
},
"propertyNames": { "enum": ["foo", "bar"] },
"definitions": {
"base": {
"properties": {
"foo": { "type": "string" }
}
}
}
}
I'm trying to replicate an Azure DevOps process from one organization to another via the AZDO REST Api. I'm working on replicating the layout and am stuck because I can't discover the relationship between a custom field and a picklist when querying the source AZDO instance.
In my scenario I have a test work item type which I've called Issue. On the Issue interface I've created a custom field which is a picklist. While I can retrieve a list of lists via the Rest API and examine the field as well, I can't figure out how the two are related.
Here is a partial payload from the field:
{
"count": 39,
"value": [
...
{
"referenceName": "Custom.IssueSource",
"name": "Issue Source",
"type": "string",
"description": "Who is this attributed to",
"required": true,
"url": "https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/work/processes/f390103e-7097-4f19-b5b5-f9dbcf92bb6f/behaviors",
"customization": "custom"
},
... ]
}
and here is a partial payload from the lists get query which I used trial and error to determine was the picklist I've assigned:
{
"count": 10,
"value": [
...
{
"id": "2998d4e4-2bec-4935-98a1-b67a0b0b6d5d",
"name": "picklist_e854661e-8620-4ad9-be28-b974c5cb3a5d",
"type": "String",
"isSuggested": false,
"url": "https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/work/processes/lists/2998d4e4-2bec-4935-98a1-b67a0b0b6d5d"
},
...
]
}
Here is a partial layout response for the WIT:
{
"pages": [
{
"id": "d0171d51-ff84-4038-afc1-8800ab613160.System.WorkItemType.Details",
"inherited": true,
"label": "Details",
"pageType": "custom",
"visible": true,
"isContribution": false,
"sections": [
{
"id": "Section1",
"groups": [
...
{
"id": "bf03e049-5062-4d82-b91d-4396541fbed2",
"label": "Custom",
"isContribution": false,
"visible": true,
"controls": [
{
"id": "Custom.IssueSource",
"label": "Issue Source",
"controlType": "FieldControl",
"readOnly": false,
"visible": true,
"isContribution": false
}
]
}
]
},
... ]
}
Using fiddler against the AZDO web interface, the only time I see a reference to the picklist is from another non-AZDO API to https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/Contribution/dataProviders/query
Is there a way to discover the link via the AZDO Rest API? I saw this question which was similar but was about creating the link
Figured it out. Turns out you need to query from a different scope - work item tracking rather than work item tracking process:
https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/wit/fields/Custom.IssueSource?api-version=5.0-preview.2
returns
{
"name": "Issue Source",
"referenceName": "Custom.IssueSource",
"description": "Who is this attributed to",
"type": "string",
"usage": "workItem",
"readOnly": false,
"canSortBy": true,
"isQueryable": true,
...
"isIdentity": false,
--> "isPicklist": true,
"isPicklistSuggested": false,
--> "picklistId": "2998d4e4-2bec-4935-98a1-b67a0b0b6d5d",
"url": "https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/wit/fields/Custom.IssueSource"
}
So I just used 2 working days trying to figure this out. We are automatic rendering process for maps. All the data is given in SQL base and my job is to write "wrapper" so we can implement this in our in-house framework. I managed all but one needed requests.
That request is POST featuretype since this is a way of creating a layer that can later be rendered.
I have all requests saved in postman for pre-testing on example data given by geoserver itself. I can't even get response with status code 201 and always get 500 internal server error. This status is described as possible syntax error in sytax. But I actually just copied and pasted exampled and used geoserver provided data.
This is the requst: http://127.0.0.1:8080/geoserver/rest/workspaces/tiger/datastores/nyc/featuretypes
and its body:
{
"name": "poi",
"nativeName": "poi",
"namespace": {
"name": "tiger",
"href": "http://localhost:8080/geoserver/rest/namespaces/tiger.json"
},
"title": "Manhattan (NY) points of interest",
"abstract": "Points of interest in New York, New York (on Manhattan). One of the attributes contains the name of a file with a picture of the point of interest.",
"keywords": {
"string": [
"poi",
"Manhattan",
"DS_poi",
"points_of_interest",
"sampleKeyword\\#language=ab\\;",
"area of effect\\#language=bg\\;\\#vocabulary=technical\\;",
"Привет\\#language=ru\\;\\#vocabulary=friendly\\;"
]
},
"metadataLinks": {
"metadataLink": [
{
"type": "text/plain",
"metadataType": "FGDC",
"content": "www.google.com"
}
]
},
"dataLinks": {
"org.geoserver.catalog.impl.DataLinkInfoImpl": [
{
"type": "text/plain",
"content": "http://www.google.com"
}
]
},
"nativeCRS": "GEOGCS[\"WGS 84\", \n DATUM[\"World Geodetic System 1984\", \n SPHEROID[\"WGS 84\", 6378137.0, 298.257223563, AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"7030\"]], \n AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"6326\"]], \n PRIMEM[\"Greenwich\", 0.0, AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"8901\"]], \n UNIT[\"degree\", 0.017453292519943295], \n AXIS[\"Geodetic longitude\", EAST], \n AXIS[\"Geodetic latitude\", NORTH], \n AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"4326\"]]",
"srs": "EPSG:4326",
"nativeBoundingBox": {
"minx": -74.0118315772888,
"maxx": -74.00153046439813,
"miny": 40.70754683896324,
"maxy": 40.719885123828675,
"crs": "EPSG:4326"
},
"latLonBoundingBox": {
"minx": -74.0118315772888,
"maxx": -74.00857344353275,
"miny": 40.70754683896324,
"maxy": 40.711945649065406,
"crs": "EPSG:4326"
},
"projectionPolicy": "REPROJECT_TO_DECLARED",
"enabled": true,
"metadata": {
"entry": [
{
"#key": "kml.regionateStrategy",
"$": "external-sorting"
},
{
"#key": "kml.regionateFeatureLimit",
"$": "15"
},
{
"#key": "cacheAgeMax",
"$": "3000"
},
{
"#key": "cachingEnabled",
"$": "true"
},
{
"#key": "kml.regionateAttribute",
"$": "NAME"
},
{
"#key": "indexingEnabled",
"$": "false"
},
{
"#key": "dirName",
"$": "DS_poi_poi"
}
]
},
"store": {
"#class": "dataStore",
"name": "tiger:nyc",
"href": "http://localhost:8080/geoserver/rest/workspaces/tiger/datastores/nyc.json"
},
"cqlFilter": "INCLUDE",
"maxFeatures": 100,
"numDecimals": 6,
"responseSRS": {
"string": [
4326
]
},
"overridingServiceSRS": true,
"skipNumberMatched": true,
"circularArcPresent": true,
"linearizationTolerance": 10,
"attributes": {
"attribute": [
{
"name": "the_geom",
"minOccurs": 0,
"maxOccurs": 1,
"nillable": true,
"binding": "com.vividsolutions.jts.geom.Point"
},
{},
{},
{}
]
}
}
So it is example case and I can't get any useful response from the server. I get the code 500 with body name (the first item in json). Similarly I get same code with body FeatureTypeInfo when trying with xml body(first tag).
I already tried the request in new instance of geoserver in Docker (changed the port) and still no success.
I check if datastore, workspace is available and that layer "poi" doesn't yet exists.
Here are also some logs of request (similar for xml body):
2018-08-03 07:35:02,198 ERROR [geoserver.rest] -
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException: name at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DefaultMapper.realClass(DefaultMapper.java:79)
at .....
Does anyone know the solution to this and got it working. I am using GeoServer 2.13.1
So i was still looking for the answer and using this post (https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/12970/create-a-layer-in-geoserver-using-rest) got to the right content to POST featureType and hence creating a layer in GeoServer.
The documentation is off in REST API docs.
Using above link I found out that when using JSON there is a missing insertion in JSON. For API to work here we need to add:
{featureType:
name: "...",
nativeName: "...",
.
.
.}
So that it doesn't start with "name" attribute but it is contained in "featureType".
I didn't try that for XML also but I guess it could be similar.
Hope this helps someone out there struggling like I did.
Blaz is correct here, you need an outer object of FeatureType and then an inner object with your config. So;
{
"featureType": {
"name": "layer",
"nativeName": "poi",
"your config": "stuff"
}
I find though that using a post request I get very little if any response and its not obvious if the layer creation worked. But you can call http://IP:8080/geoserver/rest/layers.json to check if your new layer is there.
It costs me a lot of time to create FeatureTypes using REST API. Use Json like this really works:
{
"featureType": {
"name": "layer",
"nativeName": "poi"
"otherProperties...":"values..."
}
And use Json below to create Workspace:
{
"workspace": {
"name": "test_workspace"
}
}
The REST API is out of date now. That's disappointing. Is there anyone knows how to get the lastest REST API document?
I am using ibm graph in bluemix and new to this.
I created a graph named 'test' using the GUI provided by bluemix and uploaded the sample data 'Music Festival' provided by ibm in that graph.
Now I am trying to query all the vertices having label 'attendee' using below query.
def gt = graph.traversal();
gt.V().hasLabel("attendee");
But I am getting error as
Error: Error encountered evaluating script def gt = graph.traversal();gt.V().hasLabel("attendee"); with reason com.thinkaurelius.titan.core.TitanException: Could not find a suitable index to answer graph query and graph scans are disabled: [(~label = attendee)]:VERTEX
Not sure what I am doing wrong.
Can somebody tell where am i going wrong?
How can i get rid of this error and get the expected output?
Thanks
#Radhika, Your Gremlin query is a valid Gremlin query. However, some vendors (such as IBM Graph and Titan) chose to only allow users to start their queries with a query that is indexed.This is to make sure you get the performance of your queries. Calling hasLabel() by itself will give you the Could not find a suitable index... error as you can't create indexes for labels. What you need to do is follow this step with a step that uses a indexed property as in this query :
graph.traversal();gt.V().hasLabel("band").has("genre","pop");
An index for genre has been created in the schema for the sample music festival data as you can see below
{
"propertyKeys": [
{ "name": "name", "dataType": "String", "cardinality": "SINGLE" },
{ "name": "gender", "dataType": "String", "cardinality": "SINGLE" },
{ "name": "age", "dataType": "Integer", "cardinality": "SINGLE" },
{ "name": "genre", "dataType": "String", "cardinality": "SINGLE" },
{ "name": "monthly_listeners", "dataType": "String", "cardinality": "SINGLE" },
{ "name":"date","dataType":"String","cardinality":"SINGLE" },
{ "name":"time","dataType":"String","cardinality":"SINGLE" }
],
"vertexLabels": [
{ "name": "attendee" },
{ "name": "band" },
{ "name": "venue" }
],
"edgeLabels": [
{ "name": "bought_ticket", "multiplicity": "MULTI" },
{ "name":"advertised_to","multiplicity":"MULTI" },
{ "name":"performing_at","multiplicity":"MULTI" }
],
"vertexIndexes": [
{ "name": "vByName", "propertyKeys": ["name"], "composite": true, "unique": false },
{ "name": "vByGender", "propertyKeys": ["gender"], "composite": true, "unique": false },
{ "name": "vByGenre", "propertyKeys": ["genre"], "composite": true, "unique": false}
],
"edgeIndexes" :[
{ "name": "eByBoughtTicket", "propertyKeys": ["time"], "composite": true, "unique": false }
]
That's why the above query works and you need to do the same.
If you don't have a schema, create one. You can model it after the
one above or follow the API
doc
Create an (Vertex/Label) index for the properties that you'll start
your traversals from. In this example, Name, Gender and Genre for
vertex properties and name for the edge properties.
Call the schema
endpoint
to add your schema to your graph
It's recommended to create your schema before adding any data to
your graph so that you don't have to reindex later. That'll save you
a lot of time.
Once you create your schema, you can't modify what you created
already, but you can add new properties/indexes later on.
Look at the following code samples for Java and Nodejs for the exact code to use.
I hope that helps
I'm trying to create an endpoint with many path parameters:
/api/v1/{option1}
/api/v1/{option1}/{option2}
/api/v1/{option1}/{option2}/{option3}
Using JAWS awsm.json, I want to create GET methods for all 3 routes. How(if possible) can I accomplish this using Serverless Framework?
CF:
{
"lambda": {
"envVars": [],
"deploy": true,
"package": {
"optimize": {
"builder": "browserify",
"minify": true,
"ignore": [],
"exclude": [
"aws-sdk"
],
"includePaths": []
},
"excludePatterns": []
},
"cloudFormation": {
"Description": "",
"Handler": "aws_modules/static/handler.handler",
"MemorySize": 1024,
"Runtime": "nodejs",
"Timeout": 6
}
},
"apiGateway": {
..path => /api/v1/{firstname}..
}
}
atm, there is no way to do this via Serverless Framework.
one thing i found out was that u can omit values in the url so itll be considered blank.
ex:
api/v1/option1//option3
so this considers option2 as blank. so this kinda solves the issue except user would need to add the additional /s