I am trying to link two doxygen html documentations. To this end, I generated the first documentation for package A using GENERATE_TAGFILE, then I set in the Doxyfile of package B TAGFILES = "pathtotagfile = relpathtodocumentation". This seems to work properly, since there are no warnings. However, I the connection of the two packages is not as deep as I would like it to be.
Using doxygen 1.8.13, I only see links to the external files. Can I configure that classes and namespaces also list external stuff? I have set ALLEXTERNALS, EXTERNAL_GROUPS and EXTERNAL_PAGES to YES, but still I only see external files.
Using doxygen 1.8.4, external packages appear under Related Pages, but this seems to have been changed. I would have appreciated this. Can I reenable it in the latest version?
I also welcome hints at how Link to external documentation works. The doxygen help is a bit short here.
Related
I come from the world of JavaDocs and love the DX of working on a thoroughly-annotated application after a certain level of complexity.
Being able to hover over and peek all the props (and implied types) of a component with some brief documentation would save me so much time instead of having to open up and read through the whole component. Better yet, running a command to generate a documentation site just like you can with JavaDocs would be dope!
Are there any standards or tools built around creating SvelteDocs? I looked through the VS Code marketplace and didn't see any documentation tooling related to Svelte.
I stumbled upon this question in search of more in-depth documentation for the hover/peek documentation method I've been using. It seems that it is not very well documented (ironically) but it is a part of Svelte language-tools and I've been using it for some time with Svelte for VS Code so I'm sure there was more documentation at some point. The way it's used is as follows in your component. I remember reading somewhere that it needs to be the first thing in your component, but I can't find that source anymore.
<!--
#component
some markdown here
-->
For some reasons the only documentation I can find of it is here. But it provides very nice markdown support so you can craft some very informative hover/peek documentation for your components.
EDIT:
Still can't locate official documentation for the #component commenting feature but realized it is indeed described in the FAQ: https://svelte.dev/faq#how-do-i-document-my-components Does this information belong in the actual docs? Maybe.
After more digging, I found just a couple projects for documenting Svelte.
SvelteDoc Parser -- takes a VueDoc approach, based on JSDoc standards, generates JSON documentation for Svelte components
Svelte-Docs -- documentation in Markdown mixed with Svelte's features, can embed components in the generated doc pages
Both look interesting while taking completely separate approaches to solving the issue of application documentation. Perhaps there's still room to build a CLI-based site generator for the SvelteDoc Parser which could be turned into a VS Code plugin!
It is difficult to find a good one. I recommend
https://github.com/carbon-design-system/sveld
It looks very promising. It offers export in Typescript definitions, JSON and Markdown. In my opinion there is only one critical bug left (Markdown generation) so hopefully it can be used very soon.
As of lately, I see that the NuGet package pages include a Documentation section:
In all packages that I've checked, though, the only contents of that section is a seemingly expandable Show more item, which, when expanded, reveals to sport no further content.
As the docs do not appear to contain any hint about how that item works, I am asking here: How can I provide (presumably) package documentation for a NuGet package that will show up in that section? (And can you point out any example package that illustrates what the docs will look like on the NuGet package website?)
Notably, my packages contain the documentation XML files generated by the C# compiler from documentation comments. Yet, nothing shows up in the Documentation section, so that's not what is supposed to appear there.
The section you are mentioning is on a specific packages page on Nuget.org. For example on the RestSharp package page, this shows the Documentation near the top of the page. This section is NOT related to any package data/details. I point out RestSharp because this package does come with a readme.txt file (which is displayed after installing that package). I initially thought it might be related to the readme.txt file. However, it is not!
No, this section is only displayed when you manually configure it from the NuGet website. See the image below (taken from a package I have previously uploaded):
You can manually add text, direct the website to a file, or upload a file directly. It is in markdown format.
I have published a couple of NuGet packages (.NET class libraries). The packages include XML documentation file for each DLL. All packages are published on www.nuget.org and www.symbolsource.org.
Now, is there a website/service which will automatically generate (and host) documentation for my packages? I am picturing some sort of mini-site for my packages, where users can see all class definitions, their methods and related documentation from the XML file (basically something like MSDN but for my package)?
Ideally every time I publish a nuget package, I want to be able to go to www.SomeNugetDocumentationSite.com/packages/MyPackage and see MSDN-like documentation for my packages.
Thank you.
I have noticed that nudoq.org does such thing for my Pkcs11Interop package. I have never registered there or anything like that so I guess they are generating documentation from XML file which is present in the package.
However I still prefer to generate documentation with doxygen (which by the way uses the same inlined XML comments present in C# source code) and host it by myself because this way I can fully control the result.
I need to implement a documentation generation solution for my workplace and have narrowed it down to the three mentioned in the title. I have been able to find very little information in the way of formalized comparisons between these solutions, and I'm hoping that those of you with experience in one or more of the above can weigh in:
Here is what I have been able to glean from my initial pass:
HeaderDoc Pros: Consistent with apple's existing docs, compatibility with making apple docsets
HeaderDoc Cons: Difficult to modify behavior, project is not actively worked on, many have switched away from it (meaning there must be something deficient, though I can't quantify it).
Doxygen Pros:
Active support community b/c of wide use base, very customizable, most output types (like latex etc)
Doxygen Cons:
Takes work to make it look/behave consistent with apples docs, compatibility with apple docsets is not as simple
AppleDoc Pros:
Looks consistent with apple's existing docs, compatibility with making apple docsets,
AppleDoc Cons:
Issue with documentation of typedefs, enums, and functions, actively being developed
Does this sound accurate? Our desired solution will have:
Consistent look and feel with apples objective-c class reference
Ability for option-click to pull up documentation reference from within Xcode, and then link to the doc (just like apple's classes)
Smart handling of categories, extensions, and the like (even custom categories of apple's classes)
Ability to create our own reference pages (like this page: Loading… that can include images, and be linkable from generated class references seamlessly, like how apple's UIViewController class reference links to the linked page.
Easy to run command line commands that can be integrated into build scripts
Graceful handling of very large codebase
Based on all of the information above, are any of the above solutions clearly better than the others? Any suggestions or information to add would be extremely appreciated.
As the creator and lead developer of doxygen, let me also provide my perspective
(obviously biased as well ;-)
If you are looking for a 100% faithful replica of Apple's own documentation style, then AppleDoc is a better choice in that respect. With doxygen you'll have a hard time to get that exact same look, so I would not recommend to try.
With respect to Xcode docsets; Apple provides instructions how to set that up with doxygen (written in the time Xcode 3 was released). For Xcode 4 there is also a nice guide how to integrate doxygen.
As of version 1.8.0, doxygen supports Markdown markup, as well a large number of additional markup commands.
With doxygen you can include documentation on the main page (#mainpage) as well as on subpages (using #subpage or #page). Inside a page you can create sections and subsections. In fact, doxygen's user manual was completely written using doxygen. Besides that, you can group classes or functions together (using #defgroup and #ingroup) and inside a class make custom sections (using #name).
Doxygen uses a configuration file as input. You can generate a template with default values using doxygen -g or use a graphical editor to create and edit one. You can also pipe options through doxygen via a script using doxygen - (see question 17 of the FAQ for an example)
Doxygen is not limited to Objective-C, it supports a large range of languages including C, C++, and Java. Doxygen is also not limited to the Mac platform, e.g. it runs on Windows and Linux too. Doxygen's output also supports more than just HTML; you can generate PDF output (via LaTeX) or RTF and man pages.
Doxygen also goes beyond pure documentation; doxygen can create various graphs and diagrams from the source code (see the dot related options). Doxygen can also create a browsable and syntax highlighted version of your code, and cross-reference that with the documentation (see the source browser related options).
Doxygen is very fast for small to medium sized projects (the diagram generation can be slow though, but nowadays runs on multiple CPU cores in parallel and graphs from one run are reused in the next run).
For very large projects (e.g. millions of lines of code) doxygen allows the projects to be split into multiple parts and can then link the parts together as I explained here.
A nice real-life example of using doxygen for Objective-C can be found here.
The development of doxygen highly depends on user feedback. We have an active mailing list for questions and discussions and a bug tracker for both bugs and feature requests.
Most users of doxygen use it for C and C++ code, so naturally these languages have the most mature support and the output is more tuned towards the features and needs for these languages. That said, also wishes for and issues with other languages are taken seriously.
Note that I do nearly all doxygen development and most testing on a Mac myself.
I'm the author of appledoc, so this answer may be biased :) I tried all mentioned generators though (and more) but got frustrated as none produced results I wanted to have (similar goals as you).
According your points (I only mention appledoc and doxygen, I don't recollect headerdoc that well):
Consistent look: appledoc out of the box, other need to tweak css, but probably doable.
Generation of documentation sets (for Xcode references): appledoc full support for searchable and option-clickable documentation out of the box, doxygen generates xml and makefile which you need to invoke yourself. Additionally appledoc supports published docsets out of the box.
Categories: appledoc allows you to merge categories to known classes or leave them separate, foundation & other apple class categories are listed separately in index file. doxygen: this wasn't working best when I tried it.
Custom reference pages: appledoc supports out of the box using either markdown or custom html, doxygen: you can include custom documentation to main page, don't know if you can include more pages.
Easy command line: depends how you look at it: appledoc can take all arguments through command line switches (but also supports optional global and project settings plist files) so it should be very easy to integrate with build scripts. doxygen requires usage of configuration file to setup all parameters.
Large codebases: all tools should support this, although didn't compare timewise. Also not sure if any tool supports cached values (running over previously collected data in order to save some time) - I am looking into adding this for next major release.
It's some time since I tried using other tools, so above mentioned issues with doxygen/headerdoc may have been addressed! appledoc itself also has disadvantages: like you mention there's no support for enums, structs, functions etc (there was some work done in this direction, check this fork), and it has it's own set of issues that may prevent you using it, depending your requirements.
I am currently working on major update that will cover most glaring issues, including support for enums, structs etc. I'm regularly pushing new stuff to experimental branch as soon as I finish larger chunks and make it stable enough, so you can follow the progress. But it's still very early and progress depends on my time so it may take quite a while until working solution.
Xcode 5 will now parse your comments to search for documentation and display it:
You don't have to use appledoc or doxygen anymore (at least when you don't want to export your docs). More information can be found here
hey everyone, we just added a nightly action to process the entire source tree with doxygen and place the output onto development webserver.
We also already have a sharepoint structure which holds design documents for various modules/projects. Currently, the level at which we are keeping this documentation is relatively high. We discuss structures of modules and talk about the major classes, but never go down to the individual method level. I wanted to bridge that gap by having hyperlinks in the SDS word documents that would point to doxygen output.
I noticed the links look like this:
http://example.com/docs/ProjectName/d4/d98/class_c_reader.html
http://example.com/docs/ProjectName/d4/d16/class_c_stream.html
The part that sketches me out a bit is "d4", "d98" and "d16" strings in the path. If I copy these links and create the hyperlinks, does anyone know if these URLs are guaranteed be preserved in the future. As I said, entire doxygen output gets regenerated nightly.
You can disable the d4/d98 subdirectories by disabling CREATE_SUBDIRS in the doxygen configuration.
Whether the name of the HTML files will stay the same I do not know for sure but from what I have seen when using doxygen it seems so. If you want to know for sure you can always look at the doxygen source.
Probably these links will not stay permanent.
Furthermore, Doxygen has a XML representation of the generated documentation but even this interface resp. the corresponding DSD has been changed with new releases of doxygen. This is quite frustrating, as we had used the XML representation for a similar application with the assumption that the structures would be kept identical with every new release.