I am trying to use Keycloak as a single sign on authentication provider for my superset environment. Superset uses flask-appbuilder.security and flask-login. I previously posted a question about it here:
Using OpenID/Keycloak with Superset
A problem I've encountered since then is that, when a user logs into superset, and logs out from another application, they stay logged in with superset.
I think my best approach should be to check whether the user is still authenticated with the sso. The library I'm using (flask-oidc) provides a user_loggedin check, but I'm not sure where I should call it from.
Where in flask-appbuilder.security or flask-login can I hook this additional authentication check?
Related
I'm just starting a new project. The result will be an API server and a progressive web app. The API server is implemented with TypeScript and the NestJS framework, the client with Angular 6.
I've been flirting with keycloak for some time. Still, I'm not quite sure it's right for me yet. But I don't want to worry about things like token renewal anymore and find it sexy that Keycloak tells me how to create user roles.
What bothers me, is the following - integration. For my use case it is necessary that the login and all features like password reset and so on are part of my application. That means I want to create forms myself in order to be able to do this perfectly in my own design and not have a second translation process, etc. Keycloak themes are not an option. So is it possible to hide keycloak in such a way, or is it so complex that I shouldn't use Keyloak in the first place? Afaik there is already an issue with password resets - I can't request it from the user side but have to make an REST call to the admin endpoint - which is okay but not ideal since it requires me to do more server side logic ( and that is not why I want to use Keycloak).
In addition, Keycloak is too much about the GUI - which makes it difficult for me, especially during development. Because I also want to provide my team with a local instance of keycloak during development. But what is the concept to import the initial data into realms, apps and also users into Keycloak? I found some JSON imports - but so far only for realms and apps. Is there also a function to import a whole dumb?
So that my team builds on a pre-built setup and has a user for each role. A reproducible setup with Vagrant or Docker which contains the import of initial data - that would be the goal.
So in short my questions:
Is it still worth the effort using Keycloak if I want to use everything via the API or should I simply use Passport and JWT?
Can I have a reproducible setup during my development that includes realms, apps, users, user roles, etc?
So, the question asked few months ago, but I also faces with that question, and I want to answer on it.
I think that you don't need Keycloak, it is fairly enough for you to use OAuth2 and JWT.
Let's justify my answer:
You have just one client - Angular application. Keycloak useful, when you have many clients (web-js, mobile platforms) and you want to create and manage them dynamically. But, I think that, in your case, you create your client once without modification in the future.
Also, Keycloak very useful, when you have a lot of integration with third part systems (Google, Fb, Twitter and etc) because Keycloak has them out-of-box. Or you need to integrate with some SAML or LDAP provider.
You may use Keycloak, if you need some Identity and User management platform, and when you have complicated user access flow.
In the end, you could consider Keycloak, if you need SSO (Single Sign On) feature. Once logged-in to Keycloak, users don't have to login again to access a different application. But, by your description, you have just one application.
Keycloak offers features such as Single-Sign-On (SSO), Identity Brokering and Social Login, User Federation, Client Adapters, an Admin Console, and an Account Management Console.
It's an out of box solution for rapid security layer development of application.You could have single common security layer for multiple application .
You can implement you security mechanism without using keycloak.
I have not been able to divine the way I might add extra claims from my application database. Given my limited understanding, I see two ways:
After successful authentication have keycloak pull extra claims from the application database somehow. This app database is postgres, for example.
Have the application update the jwt with extra claims using a shared key.
I would like some feedback both paths. I feel that the fist option may be safer. However I am not sure where to begin that implementation journey.
Answering my own question here. I cross-posted this question to the Keycloak users mailing list here (http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/2017-April/010315.html) and got an answer that seems reasonable.
This is pasted from the answer I received there.
I use the first option. I do it with a protocol mapper, which is a convenient place to do it because there the token is already built by keycloak but hasn't been signed yet. This is the procedure :
User logs in
My custom protocol mapper gets called, where I overwrite the transformAccessToken method
Here I log in the client where the protocol mapper is in into keycloak, as a service. Here don't forget to use another client ID instead the one you're building the protocol mapper for, you'll enter an endless recursion otherwise.
I get the access token into the protocol mapper and I call the rest endpoint of my application to grab the extra claims, which is secured
Get the info returned by the endpoint and add it as extra claims
I'm new to Shiro. We are attempting to use Shiro with Stormpath. I've been trying to dissect the examples to come up with a solution to what I want to do, but I'm unsuccessful so far.
For now, I'm simply trying to create REST services to do what I want, and I'll tie a real client in later. This is what I'm trying to achieve as my first step:
I want to have a client hit a REST endpoint (login) on my server. My server would authenticate, and return a JWT to the client. This JWT would then be used to access secured endpoints on my server. (I have written Java code that can successfully authenticate against Stormpath).
My problem is the JWT. I expected that a JWT would be created for me, or at least easily accessible. I can't find a way to get one. I have seen sample code on how to build one, but that doesn't seem like the way I would expect to acquire one.
I have run through several examples, but most seem to deal with JSP interfaces, and I can't seem to make the leap to what I'm trying to do.
Is this approach reasonable? Any guidance is appreciated.
Edit 1
I now have a Java client that can authenticate using the Shiro servlet and retrieve a JWT. I have this running as a deployed application (war) in GlassFish. My next step is to use that JWT to authenticate against a different application that has my REST endpoints. This REST application doesn't need to know anything about how to authenticate - I just want to pass the JWT along in the call to a given REST endpoint and use Shiro (via annotations) to control access to the endpoint (if that is indeed possible). All of the examples I can find seem to be "all-in-one" examples (bundling JSP with Shiro/Stormpath configurations, etc). I'm trying to determine the minimum working configuration for securing REST endpoints and I'm having difficulty determining which pieces of the configuration I need.
Edit 2
I am using the Stormpath-Shiro-Servlet (as stolen from the Shiro Servlet example) as my authentication back-end. Using my Java client, I am sending a login request to the servlet, and I am indeed getting back a JWT. However, I am not able to successfully use the JWT to access my other rest resources. My rest calls result in this error:
org.apache.shiro.authz.UnauthenticatedException: This subject is anonymous - it does not have any identifying principals and authorization operations require an identity to check against. A Subject instance will acquire these identifying principals automatically after a successful login is performed be executing org.apache.shiro.subject.Subject.login(AuthenticationToken) or when 'Remember Me' functionality is enabled by the SecurityManager. This exception can also occur when a previously logged-in Subject has logged out which makes it anonymous again. Because an identity is currently not known due to any of these conditions, authorization is denied.
First, I don't understand why the servlet 'login' doesn't actually log me in and give me non-anonymous principle? Second, I am attempting to do everything on a separate client, so I don't have access to Subject.login (is this a correct assumption?).
Take a look at this example from github/stormpath-shiro
The JWT creation is managed for you by the Stormpath API. If you start up one of the examples, (the servlet one above, or the spring-boot-web example), after login, you will have a JWT cookie. There is background info in this blog post.
I'm working on releasing strompath-shiro now, but figured I'd include these link here so you can start looking.
A customer of ours has just purchased CQ5 and would like to externalize all of its security. We'd like to use an STS server for SSO and then leverage a custom authorization/attribute provider instead of the CQ5 repository. Ultimately, we do not want to use LDAP in any way.
Here is how we envision this (some pieces already working):
User browses to CQ5 Dispatcher running in Apache
Apache filter redirects user to STS site where login is completed.
User is redirected back to Apache with SAML Claims.
User ID token is placed as cookie into browser. (everything is working up to here)
CQ5 captures that cookie based on the SSO configuration (working)
Problem starts here: From here, we want to call a custom authorization provider for the user's attributes, roles, groups etc...
We have tried to figure out how to do this and can't seem to find the missing link.
Do we need to create a custom login module? Do we need to create a custom principal provider? Do we somehow use the existing LDAP capability in CQ5 but have it call a custom class which leverages the external auth source?
If anyone here has any idea how to do this, their karma quotient would be full for the year if they could share it. I'm not sure if this is a basic thing you do with JAAS or even where to put my classes after I've created them.
We've worked really hard on this so far and seem to be close, but we keep hitting dead-ends.
Thanks so much if you have an idea where to begin!!
-joe
Recent versions of AEM now include the SAMLAuthenticationHandler which allows you to:
Redirect users to SSO to simulate IDP initiated login, or
Allow AEM to perform SP initiated login with IDP
Specify attributes to take from the SAML Assertion and add to the user's profile node (not sure if you can use this for groups)
Specify which groups users should be added to
Set a cookie called request-path that will store the URL the user arrived at, and then redirect them to that location when they're authenticated (ie. deep linking)
This makes relying on the SAMLAuthenticationHandler better than using Apache to redirect. The current version of the handler bundled with AEM 6.2 does not properly set the cookie when using the redirect method, but Adobe does have an updated version that they can provide that will fix that problem.
I normally recommend that clients do not have their own authentication handlers developed inside AEM.
When not using LDAP, this does create an issue where users will not exist until they've logged in. Additionally, when your architecture includes more than one load balanced publisher, it is possible that a user may exist on one server user synchronization.
Try searching the google group for SSO details. Here's one useful post:
http://groups.google.com/group/day-communique/browse_thread/thread/72c235c83a501252/fba4d08a90487156?lnk=gst&q=SSO#fba4d08a90487156
It seems that you will have to implement a custom LoginModule, more information here: http://dev.day.com/docs/en/crx/current/deploying/custom-login-modules.html
I've got two separate homemade applications that need to communicate among themselves. One is a frontend application (asp.net actually), the other is a backend interface to an accounting application. The backend interface was not created specifically for this frontend - it is a generic interface that many other applications use to integrate with our product.
For the convenience of users we wish to provide a Windows Authentication in our frontend application. That means however that we need to pass the credentials on to the backend application which has to check them.
We do not wish to set up our frontend as a "trusted" application to the backend which can authenticate itself as any user. If the frontend was to be hacked, it would then also compromise the backend system.
As I understand it, one way to do it with Windows Authentication is Kerberos Delegation. However this requires to be explicitly enabled for the user that is to be delegated, and the machine which does the delegation (the server with our frontend). By default these options are disabled in Active Directory, and I suspect that many sysadmins will have their reservations about turning them on for all their users.
Also, I'm not really sure that this is what Kerberos Delegation was meant for. I don't need our frontend to impersonate the user that is connecting. I just need to prove that this user has authenticated itself to me.
How would you do this?
I'm not clear what you can and can't do with your use case but I can answer the question what Kerberos Delegation was meant for.
First let's talk about what Kerberos does prior to delegation. It is important to understand this part well because it is subtle.
Kerberos authenticates the identity of BOTH ends of a communication between two end-points across a network, those end-points can be interactive users or services running on a computer.
This is strong authentication so it will not allow a man-in-middle attack in any form. If set up correctly an end point can guarantee they won't be compromised. To the level of the service name (if you are connecting to IIs on a machine it is different than connecting to SQL Server on the same machine). It makes heavy use of modern encryption techniques and requires the use of secure certificates. The details of the authentication protocol are complicated and not worth going into now, but it involves about 20 different distinct steps of confirmation between the two authenticating end points and authentication server (in windows the Domain Controller is the authentication server).
So what the heck is delegation?
Delegation is a Microsoft extension to the Kerberos standard which
allows a trusted source to continue the authentication to another
end-point.
This allows you to act as a "man in the middle" -- however many settings have to be explicitly setup, certificates installed, etc to allow this to work. It is far from simple. (EDIT: Here is another SO answer on the details - https://stackoverflow.com/a/954154/215752)
So, for example, you could have someone authenticate to a website and then have the .NET code connect to an SQL Server AS THE SAME USER to read data with that user's rights.
Now to answer your question, since I'm not sure what you want to do I present three choices:
1) You want to connect to the back end system as the SAME user as the one authenticating at the website.
In this case Kerberos delegation is perfect -- it does exactly what you want.
2) You want to connect to the back end system as a DIFFERENT user than the one authenticating at the website (eg a service account).
In this case you don't want delegation. Kerberos to the website and Kerberos (as a different user) to the back-end will work great.
3) You want to connect to the back end system as the SAME user some of the time and as a DIFFERENT user other times. (For example, you need to validate this is a legal user for the back end system, but want to perform trusted actions as a system account other times. This is (in my experience) the most common use case.)
In this case you use both. Delegation for the connections which need to validate the user identity and then revert to the service account identity for the times when you need system access to the back end. (A previous question of mine went into the details of how to revert to the system identity on the .NET platform see How to "un-impersonate" (un-delegate?) in Kerberos.)
Here is a post describing how Kerberos works and how to set it up.
ASP.NET passing along Windows Authentication credentials
Actually Kerberos delegation is designed exactly for this use case. But the challenge here is craft this on a legacy system and with AD's settings that you do not want to change.
One possible hack is to have the Front End just send the user and the time of authentication but the backend can query the Active Directory Event Logs to determine whether that user has authenticated to the Front end. This requires you to use WIndows Event Log API.and also play around with Event Log settings in AD to log the issue of service tickets. (MY recollection is that this is the default)
-