I need to loop through a list of instances and create 1 stateful set for every instance. However, inside range I then limit myself to the scope of that loop. I need to access some global values in my statefulset.
I've solved it by just putting all global objects I need in an env variable but... this very seems hacky.
What is the correct way to loop through ranges while still being able to reference global objects?
Example of my loop
{{- $values := .Values -}}
{{- $release := .Release -}}
{{- range .Values.nodes }}
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: {{ $release.Name }} <-- Global Scope
labels:
.
.
.
env:
- name: IP_ADDRESS
value: {{ .ip_address }} <-- From range scope
.
.
.
{{- end }}
Example of values
# Global
image:
repository: ..ecr.....
# Instances
nodes:
- node1:
name: node-1
iP: 1.1.1.1
- node2:
name: node-2
iP: 1.1.1.1
When entering a loop block you lose your global context when using .. You can access the global context by using $. instead.
As written in the Helm docs -
there is one variable that is always global - $ - this variable will always point to the root context. This can be very useful when you are looping in a range and need to know the chart's release name.
In your example, using this would look something like:
{{- range .Values.nodes }}
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: {{ $.Release.Name }}
labels:
.
.
.
env:
- name: IP_ADDRESS
value: {{ .ip_address }}
.
.
.
{{- end }}
The question is about the global scope, but it is possible to keep access to any outer scope by storing it, like this:
{{- $outer := . -}}
Then, if you use named variables for the range, like this:
{{- range $idx, $node := .Values.nodes }}
You don't need ., so you can restore the outer scope, like this:
{{- with $outer -}}
In your example, using this would look something like:
{{- $outer := . -}}
{{- range $idx, $node := .Values.nodes }}
{{- with $outer -}}
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: {{ .Release.Name }}
labels:
.
.
.
env:
- name: IP_ADDRESS
value: {{ $node.ip_address }}
.
.
.
{{- end }}
If you need to access the global scope only, simply add {{- with $ -}} will do.
{{- range $idx, $node := .Values.nodes }}
{{- with $ -}}
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: {{ .Release.Name }}
labels:
.
.
.
env:
- name: IP_ADDRESS
value: {{ $node.ip_address }}
.
.
.
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
The best way is not to call many external objects inside the loop.
you can declare release name at the top in a variable to overcome this issue:
{{- $release_name := .Release.Name -}}
Related
I need to reduce my 'if else code' in my helm chart template
How can I do that ?.
{{- if .Values.global }}
{{- if .Values.global.namespace }}
namespace: {{ .Values.global.namespace }}
{{- else }}
namespace: {{ .Values.namespace }}
{{- end }}
{{- else }}
namespace: {{ .Values.namespace }}
{{- end}}
name: {{.Values.name}}
You could use a variable and also {{with}} (which sets the dot), e.g.:
{{- $ns := .Values.namespace -}}
{{- with .Values.global }}{{ with.namespace }}{{ $ns = . }}{{end}{{ end -}}
namespace: {{ $ns }}
name: {{.Values.name}}
"If x is truthy, then use its value, otherwise use y" is what the Helm (Sprig) default function does. You could replace the inner conditional with
namespace: {{ .Values.global.namespace | default .Values.namespace }}
The outer conditional is trickier. The problem you're trying to work around here is, if .Values.global isn't defined, it will evaluate to nil, and then .Values.global.namespace is an error. The usual approach I use here is to again use default to get an empty dictionary if it isn't defined, at which point you can successfully do a lookup.
So you should be able to replace the entire block with
{{- $global := .Values.global | default dict }}
namespace: {{ $global.namespace | default .Values.namespace }}
I am new to helm charts and I am building helm chart to deploy an app on kubernetes, as part of it I have created a deployment template as below,
{{- $outer := . -}}
{{- range $index, $service := .Values.myservices}}
{{- with $outer }}
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: {{ $service.name }}
labels:
{{- include "myhelm.labels" $ | nindent 4 }}
spec:
.
.
.
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
Here I am using a template "myhelm.labels", which is defined in _helpers.tpl as below,
{{/*
Common labels
*/}}
{{- define "myhelm.labels" -}}
helm.sh/chart: {{ include "myhelm" . }}
{{- if .Chart.AppVersion }}
app.kubernetes.io/version: {{ .Chart.AppVersion | quote }}
{{- end }}
app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: {{ .Release.Service }}
{{- end }}
I like to include some more labels provided in the values.yaml as below
myservices:
api:
name: "com-api"
labels:
app: "com-api"
selectorLabels:
app: "com-cp"
podAnnotations: {}
container:
image: "com-api"
port: 24000
name: "api"
nodeSelector:
app: "com-cp-api"
affinity: {}
tolerations: {}
ui:
name: "com-ui"
labels:
app: "com-ui"
selectorLabels:
app: "com-ui"
podAnnotations: {}
container:
image: "com-ui"
port: 23000
name: "ui"
nodeSelector:
app: "com-cp-ui"
affinity: {}
tolerations: {}
Along with "myhelm.labels" (common labels) I also want to include service specific labels like $service.labels.
Please help me, how can I do it ?
I am able to add specific labels one by one like,
labels:
{{- include "dlc-project-service-control-plane.labels" $ | nindent 4 }}
app: {{ $service.labels.app }}
But, I am looking for a solution, if I have multiple labels under $service.labels in values.yaml and want to add all of them in a single statement in deployment template.
Please share the code snippet if you already know the solution, it helps.
Thanks
I am able to achieve it using the toYaml, below is the code snippet,
{{- $outer := . -}}
{{- range $index, $service := .Values.myservices}}
{{- with $outer }}
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: {{ $service.name }}
labels:
{{- include "myhelm.labels" $ | nindent 4 }}
{{- toYaml $service.labels | nindent 4 }}
spec:
.
.
.
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
I am using Helm v3 and trying to iterate over a complex object/map in a YAML definition file for Kubernetes network policy with the following content:
values.yaml:
networkPolicies:
egress:
- service: microservice-name
destination:
- podLabels:
app=microservice-name
namespaceLabels:
company.com/microservices: microservice-name
protocol: TCP
ports:
- 8444
At the k8s definition file, I have this code:
egress-networkpolicy.yaml:
{{- range $v, $rule := .Values.networkPolicies.egress }}---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-kong-to-{{ $rule.service }}-egress
namespace: kong
annotations:
description: Kong egress policies
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
{{- range $label,$value := $rule.podSelector }}
{{ $label }}: {{ $value }}
{{- end }}
egress:
- to:
{{- range $from := $rule.to }}
- podSelector:
matchLabels:
{{- range $label,$value := $from.podLabels }}
{{ $label }}: {{ $value }}
{{- end }}
{{- if has $from "namespaceLabels" }}
namespaceSelector:
{{- if eq ( len $from.namespaceLabels ) 0 }} {}
{{- else }}
matchLabels:
{{- range $label,$value := $from.namespaceLabels }}
{{ $label }}: {{ $value }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- if has $rule "ports" }}
ports:
{{- range $port := $rule.service.ports }}
- protocol: {{ $port.protocol }}
- port: {{ $port }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
policyTypes:
- Egress
{{ end -}}
Unfortunately when I run helm template name-of-the-template it throws the following error:
❯ helm template name-of-the-template --debug
install.go:178: [debug] Original chart version: ""ate name-of-the-template --debug
install.go:199: [debug] CHART PATH: /Users/user/charts/name-of-the-template
Error: template: name-of-the-template/templates/egress-networkpolicy.yaml:34:13: executing "name-of-the-template/templates/egress-networkpolicy.yaml" at <has $rule "ports">: error calling has: Cannot find has on type string
helm.go:88: [debug] template: name-of-the-template/templates/egress-networkpolicy.yaml:34:13: executing "name-of-the-template/templates/egress-networkpolicy.yaml" at <has $rule "ports">: error calling has: Cannot find has on type string
I can't find the reason for Helm throwing this error at that line, but not in similar code before that line.
The has template function checks for membership in a list. In this context $rule is a mapping or dictionary (it is one of the items in the list under egress) and for that type you need to use hasKey instead.
{{- if hasKey $rule "ports" }}{{/* hasKey, not has */}}
ports:
...
{{- end }}
One thing that can simplify this slightly is to use the Go template with construct instead of if here. with acts just like if, except it also rebinds the special variable . to the conditional value if it's truthy. Accessing an undefined key in a map is okay but returns nil, which is falsey. So in this context I might write
{{- with $rule.ports }}
ports:
{{- range . }}
- protocol: {{ $rule.protocol }}
port: {{ . }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
(But note as I've written it that the . in the third and fifth lines are different variables, and that this usage also changes . as appears at the start of .Values or in template "name" . In this little loop that's not going to be a practical problem.)
I a have a couple of charts for different products. In the first one a helper was written to build out the repo, image name and tag/version. This works but as the other Chart is quite different I've gone through a simpler approach but it does not work. I get the error,
error calling include: template: MYChart/templates/_helpers.tpl:94:28: executing "getImageName" at <.Values.registryName>: nil pointer evaluating interface {}.registryName
This is the helper.
{{/*
This allows us to not have image: .Values.xxxx.ssss/.Values.xxx.xxx:.Values.ssss
in every single template.
*/}}
{{- define "imageName" -}}
{{- $registryName := .Values.registryName -}}
{{- $imageName := .Values.imageName -}}
{{- $tag := .Chart.AppVersion -}}
{{- printf "%s/%s:%s" $registryName $imageName $tag -}}
{{- end -}}
These are the values
registry:
registryName: "index.docker.io/myrepo"
image_Name: "myimage"
Calling a value like the above in a _helper.tpl should work, there are plenty of examples that use this approach. What am I missing?
The template file :
{{- $root := . -}}
{{- $FullChartName := include "myapp.fullname" . -}}
{{- $ChartName := include "myapp.name" . -}}
{{- range $worker, $parameter := .Values.workerPods }}
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: {{ $parameter.name }}-worker
spec:
replicas: {{ $parameter.replicas }}
selector:
matchLabels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: {{ $parameter.name }}-worker
app.kubernetes.io/instance: {{ $root.Release.Name }}
template:
metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: {{ $parameter.name }}-worker
app.kubernetes.io/instance: {{ $root.Release.Name }}
autoscale: "true"
annotations:
{{- if $root.Values.worker.annotations }}
{{ toYaml $root.Values.worker.annotations | indent 8 }}
{{- end }}
spec:
imagePullSecrets:
- name: myapp-registry-credentials
containers:
- name: {{ $parameter.name }}-worker
image: {{ template "imageName" . }}
imagePullPolicy: {{ $root.Values.worker.image.pullPolicy }}
command: ["/bin/sh"]
args: ["-c", "until /usr/bin/pg_isready -h $DATABASE_HOST; do sleep 2; done; bundle exec rake jobs:work"]
{{- range $container, $containerResources := $root.Values.containers }}
{{- if eq $container $parameter.size }}
resources:
{{- toYaml $containerResources.resources | nindent 12 }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
envFrom:
- configMapRef:
name: common-env
- secretRef:
name: myapp-secrets
volumeMounts:
- name: mnt-data
mountPath: "/mnt/data"
volumes:
- name: mnt-data
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: myapp-pvc
{{- with $root.Values.nodeSelector }}
nodeSelector:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }}
{{- end }}
{{- with $root.Values.affinity }}
affinity:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }}
{{- end }}
{{- with $root.Values.tolerations }}
tolerations:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
I also tried this approach and added the following to the Chart.yaml but got a similar error, I'll be honest and wasn't sure this would even work but would be interested to hear other's thoughts.
annotations:
image: "myimage"
registry: "index.docker.io/myrepo"
And the helper looked like this.
{{/*
This allows us to not have image: .Values.xxxx.ssss/.Values.xxx.xxx:.Values.ssss
in every single template.
*/}}
{{- define "imageName" -}}
{{- $registryName := .Chart.Annotations.registry -}}
{{- $imageName := .Chart.Annotations.image -}}
{{- $tag := .Chart.AppVersion -}}
{{- printf "%s/%s:%s" $registryName $imageName $tag -}}
{{- end -}}
You're calling the template with the wrong parameter. Reducing the Helm template file to the bare minimum to demonstrate this:
{{- $root := . -}}
{{- range $worker, $parameter := .Values.workerPods }}
image: {{ template "imageName" . }}
imagePullPolicy: {{ $root.Values.worker.image.pullPolicy }}
{{- end }}
The standard Go text/template range statement rebinds the . variable (I believe to the same thing as $parameter). So then when you call the imageName template, its parameter isn't the Helm root value but rather the block from the values file; .Values is undefined and returns nil; and then .Values.registryName is a lookup on nil which produces the error you see.
One standard workaround to this is to save . to a variable outside the range loop and use that variable everywhere you would have used .. And in fact you already do this, the $root.Values.worker... reference in the following line should work correctly. You just need to change this at the point of call:
image: {{ template "imageName" $root }}
I currently have a helm template for a deployment defined as
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: demo
labels:
{{- include "demo.labels" . | nindent 4 }}
app.kubernetes.io/component: "server"
spec:
replicas: {{ .Values.replicaCount }}
selector:
matchLabels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: demo
app.kubernetes.io/instance: {{ .Release.Name }}
app.kubernetes.io/component: "server"
template:
metadata:
{{- with .Values.deployment.annotations }}
annotations:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }}
{{- end }}
For the annotations, it works fine as we can pass in annotations from our values.yml. However, now I also want to add in a set of vault annotations that have predefined values into the template:
{{- if .Values.vault.enabled -}}
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject: {{ .Values.vault.enabled | quote }}
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-cache-enable: "true"
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-cache-use-auto-auth-token: "force"
vault.hashicorp.com/role: {{ .Values.vault.role | quote }}
vault.hashicorp.com/ca-cert: "/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/ca.crt"
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-init-first: "true"
traffic.sidecar.istio.io/excludeOutboundPorts: "8200"
{{- $systemcontext := .Values.vault.systemcontext -}}
{{- $releasename := .Release.Name -}}
{{- range .Values.vault.secretkeys}}
{{- $secretpath := printf "kv/%s/restricted/%s/%s" $systemcontext $releasename . }}
{{- $annotatefilename := printf "vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-secret-%s.yaml" . }}
{{ $annotatefilename }}: {{ $secretpath }}
{{ $annotatefilename }}: |
{{ printf "%s%s%s" `{{- with secret ` ($secretpath | quote) ` -}}{{ range $k, $v := .Data.data }}{{ $k }}: {{ $v }}
{{ end }}{{- end -}}`}}
{{- end -}}
How can I define the template so that it can render both sets of annotations, even if vault.enabled=false, or deployment.annotations is of empty value?
Example our values.yml:
deployment:
annotations:
test-annotation: "hello world"
test2-annotations: "foo"
vault:
enabled: true
role: myrole
systemcontext: "foo"
Thanks
You can define the additional set of annotations as a named template, that emits key: value pairs, aligned at the first column.
{{- define "annotations.vault" }}
{{- if .Values.vault.enabled -}}
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject: {{ .Values.vault.enabled | quote }}
...
{{ end -}}
{{ end -}}
Then when you need to use it, you can use the Helm include extension to invoke it. This returns a string, and so you can combine it with indent to indent it appropriately.
Your original template code uses with to skip the annotations: block entirely if nothing is present, so you can use this same technique at the top level. (You need to be careful that the template emits nothing, not even a new line, if the control is disabled.)
metadata:
labels: { as: above }
{{- with include "annotations.vault . }}
{{- . | indent 4 }}
{{- end }}
Inside the pod spec, there are two possibly places the annotations could come from. The easiest way to create a syntactically valid annotations: block is to include an artificial key: value pair:
spec:
template:
metadata:
annotations:
_: '' # meaningless, but forces a YAML dictionary
{{- with .Values.deployment.annotations }}
{{- toYaml . | indent 8 }}
{{- end }}
{{- with include "annotations.vault" . }}
{{- indent 8 . }}
{{- end }}
Or, you could capture both annotation sets into variables, and do logic based on that.
spec:
template:
metadata:
{{- $a := .Values.deployment.annotations }}
{{/* if $a then (toYaml $a) else "" end */}}
{{- $manual := $a | ternary (toYaml $a) "" }}
{{- $vault := include "annotations.vault" . }}
{{- $annotations := printf "%s%s" $manual $vault }}
{{- with $annotations }}
annotations: {{- nindent 8 . }}
{{- end }}